No govt interference in judiciary’s decisions, says former CJI Gavai

 

New Delhi: Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai on Thursday in an exclusive chat with IANS asserted that there is no government interference in the functioning or judgments of the judiciary.

His remarks come amid repeated allegations from various political leaders, including Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, who has accused the BJP and RSS of influencing constitutional institutions multiple times.

LoP Gandhi has, on several occasions, claimed that the judiciary is under pressure from the government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Earlier, former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud also responded to such criticism, stating that courts should not be viewed as the opposition, and their role is to examine laws not replace elected representatives.

Speaking to IANS, former CJI Gavai dismissed the allegations of government interference and clarified the functioning of the collegium system.

“There is no government interference. It is important that when the collegium takes a decision, several inputs are considered. The views of the executive, the Intelligence Bureau, and the law ministry are part of that process.

“Similarly, opinions of the consultee judges, chief justices concerned, chief ministers, and governors are taken into account. After all discussions, the collegium takes its independent decision. That does not mean the collegium functions under pressure,” he asserted.

Responding to concerns raised over whether the Constitution was in danger, former CJI Gavai referenced the landmark 1973 Kesavananda Bharati judgment, which established the basic structure doctrine.

He stated, “The judgment made it clear that Parliament has no power to amend the basic structure of the Constitution. If anyone still believes otherwise, then such fears are unfounded.”

Reflecting on his tenure, Justice Gavai said he felt fulfilled.

“I am fully satisfied with my tenure. I am happy, content, and do not feel there was anything I wished to do but could not accomplish.”

He also spoke about public discourse and judicial independence in the social media era.

“I do not look at social media. A judge must never decide a case based on public opinion. Once the facts, documents, and evidence are placed before the court, the judgment must follow the law — not what social media or the public expect,” Justice Gavai told IANS.

Justice B.R. Gavai, the 52nd Chief Justice of India, has had a long legal journey. Though he began his legal practice in 1985, he was familiar with the rule of law early on, having grown up in a family engaged in social activism. Throughout his career—as an advocate, judge of the Bombay High Court, Supreme Court judge, and finally as CJI—Justice Gavai demonstrated deep commitment to judicial efficiency and the rule of law. His decisions sparked discourse both in courtrooms and across digital platforms, contributing significantly to Indian jurisprudence.

Justice Gavai was sworn in as the 52nd CJI on May 14, succeeding Justice Sanjiv Khanna. His name was recommended by Justice Khanna on April 16 and approved by the Law Ministry on April 29. His appointment marked a historic milestone as he was the first Buddhist and only the second Chief Justice from the Scheduled Caste community after Justice K.G. Balakrishnan to hold the post.

–IANS

On last day in office, CJI Gavai flags challenges posed by social media

New Delhi: On the eve of passing the baton to his successor, Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai on Sunday reflected upon the challenges thrown up by social media, adding...

Would not accept any government post after retirement: Outgoing CJI Gavai

New Delhi: Outgoing Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai, who demits the highest judicial office of the country on November 23, categorically stated that he would not accept any...

SC issues notice on Kerala govt’s plea to defer SIR

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on a plea filed by the Kerala government seeking deferment of the ongoing Special...

Governors cannot indefinitely withhold assent to Bills: SC on Presidential reference

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday said that Governors cannot indefinitely withhold assent to Bills passed by state legislatures, holding that the Constitution provides only three “clear options”, i.e.,...

Sexual harassment case: Police issue notice to Kannada actress, ask her to come with proof

Bengaluru: Karnataka police on Monday issued a notice to a Kannada actress, asking her to appear before them with evidence and documents related to the allegations she has made against...

IUML moves SC seeking stay on SIR amid local body polls

New Delhi/Malappuram: The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) has moved the Supreme Court seeking an immediate stay on the Special Interim Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls underway in Kerala, arguing...

Pocso case: Karnataka HC refuses to quash summons to former CM Yediyurappa

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court on Thursday refused to quash summons issued by a Fast Track Court to former Chief Minister B.S. Yediyurappa in a case registered under the Protection...

Kerala govt moves High Court seeking temporary stay on SIR

Kochi: The Kerala government on Thursday approached the High Court seeking a temporary stay on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls being conducted by the Election Commission of...

SC ‘shocked’ over Maha court not framing charges against man for 4 years; seeks report from police, trial court

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has expressed “shock” over the continued incarceration of an accused in Maharashtra for more than four years without charges being framed, despite a charge sheet...

From ‘Butcher of Nithari’ to innocent man, Surendra Koli set free by SC

New Delhi: Surendra Koli, a man who was given the sobriquet “Butcher of Nithari”, was on Tuesday set free by the Supreme Court, which allowed his curative petition, giving a...

2020 riots: Delhi court sets aside probe order against Minister Kapil Mishra

New Delhi: A Special Court in Delhi on Monday set aside a trial court’s direction ordering “further investigation” into the alleged role of Delhi Minister Kapil Mishra in connection with...

SC seeks report in suo motu case on road accidents in Rajasthan, Telangana

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday sought detailed reports from the state governments of Rajasthan and Telangana, as well as the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and the...

Read Previous

Shivakumar’s cryptic X post heats up K’taka power tussle amid Kharge’s move to contain crisis

Read Next

Trump calls attack on National Guard an ‘act of terror’, orders 500 more troops

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com