No govt interference in judiciary’s decisions, says former CJI Gavai

 

New Delhi: Former Chief Justice of India (CJI) B.R. Gavai on Thursday in an exclusive chat with IANS asserted that there is no government interference in the functioning or judgments of the judiciary.

His remarks come amid repeated allegations from various political leaders, including Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, who has accused the BJP and RSS of influencing constitutional institutions multiple times.

LoP Gandhi has, on several occasions, claimed that the judiciary is under pressure from the government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Earlier, former CJI D.Y. Chandrachud also responded to such criticism, stating that courts should not be viewed as the opposition, and their role is to examine laws not replace elected representatives.

Speaking to IANS, former CJI Gavai dismissed the allegations of government interference and clarified the functioning of the collegium system.

“There is no government interference. It is important that when the collegium takes a decision, several inputs are considered. The views of the executive, the Intelligence Bureau, and the law ministry are part of that process.

“Similarly, opinions of the consultee judges, chief justices concerned, chief ministers, and governors are taken into account. After all discussions, the collegium takes its independent decision. That does not mean the collegium functions under pressure,” he asserted.

Responding to concerns raised over whether the Constitution was in danger, former CJI Gavai referenced the landmark 1973 Kesavananda Bharati judgment, which established the basic structure doctrine.

He stated, “The judgment made it clear that Parliament has no power to amend the basic structure of the Constitution. If anyone still believes otherwise, then such fears are unfounded.”

Reflecting on his tenure, Justice Gavai said he felt fulfilled.

“I am fully satisfied with my tenure. I am happy, content, and do not feel there was anything I wished to do but could not accomplish.”

He also spoke about public discourse and judicial independence in the social media era.

“I do not look at social media. A judge must never decide a case based on public opinion. Once the facts, documents, and evidence are placed before the court, the judgment must follow the law — not what social media or the public expect,” Justice Gavai told IANS.

Justice B.R. Gavai, the 52nd Chief Justice of India, has had a long legal journey. Though he began his legal practice in 1985, he was familiar with the rule of law early on, having grown up in a family engaged in social activism. Throughout his career—as an advocate, judge of the Bombay High Court, Supreme Court judge, and finally as CJI—Justice Gavai demonstrated deep commitment to judicial efficiency and the rule of law. His decisions sparked discourse both in courtrooms and across digital platforms, contributing significantly to Indian jurisprudence.

Justice Gavai was sworn in as the 52nd CJI on May 14, succeeding Justice Sanjiv Khanna. His name was recommended by Justice Khanna on April 16 and approved by the Law Ministry on April 29. His appointment marked a historic milestone as he was the first Buddhist and only the second Chief Justice from the Scheduled Caste community after Justice K.G. Balakrishnan to hold the post.

–IANS

IRCTC hotel scam case: Delhi HC issues notice to CBI on Rabri’s plea challenging framing of charges

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Friday issued notice to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on a plea filed by former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi challenging a...

SC rejects Justice Varma’s plea challenging impeachment proceedings over cash discovery allegations

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a plea filed by Allahabad High Court Justice Yashwant Varma -- who faces impeachment proceedings following the cash-discovery row -- challenging the...

SC refuses relief in Vijay’s ‘Jana Nayagan’ release row, tells producers to approach Madras HC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to entertain a plea filed by the producer of the Tamil film 'Jana Nayagan', starring actor-politician Vijay, seeking directions to the Central...

Suvendu Adhikari to move court after his defamation notice deadline ends for CM Mamata Banerjee

Kolkata: Following the expiration of the defamation notice deadline issued by Suvendu Adhikari, the Leader of Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly, to Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee regarding her claims...

SC delivers split verdict on validity of Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday delivered a split verdict on the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. The section mandates prior sanction from...

SC questions attitude of those feeding stray dogs in public places

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday questioned the attitude of people and organisations that feed stray dogs in public places, asking whether their compassion is limited to animals and...

SC issues notice on PIL to implement creamy layer in SC/ST reservations

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday issued notice to the Centre and all state governments on a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking the implementation of the “creamy layer” principle...

Governor will be briefed on Hate Speech Bill: Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah

Bengaluru: Speaking on the development of Governor Thawarchand Gehlot not giving consent to the controversial Hate Speech Bill, Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said on Saturday that the Governor will be...

Madras HC directs CBFC to issue U/A 16+ certificate to Vijay’s ‘Jana Nayagan‘; Board moves appeal

Chennai: The Madras High Court on Friday directed the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to promptly issue a U/A 16+ certificate to 'Jana Nayagan', the Vijay-starrer film whose theatrical...

Delhi court frames charges against Lalu Prasad, family in land-for-job case

New Delhi: In a fresh setback to Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) President Lalu Prasad Yadav and his family members, a Delhi court on Friday framed charges against them in the...

Life term for seven RSS-BJP activists in CPI-M worker Latheesh murder case

Kannur (Kerala):A court in Kerala's Kannur on Thursday sentenced seven RSS–BJP activists to life imprisonment in the 2008 murder of CPI-M worker K. Latheesh, bringing closure to one of the...

Sharjeel Imam concludes arguments in Delhi riots conspiracy case, denies coordination with Umar Khalid

New Delhi: Activist Sharjeel Imam on Thursday concluded his arguments before a Delhi court against the framing of charges in the alleged “larger conspiracy” case linked to the 2020 Northeast...

Read Previous

Shivakumar’s cryptic X post heats up K’taka power tussle amid Kharge’s move to contain crisis

Read Next

Trump calls attack on National Guard an ‘act of terror’, orders 500 more troops

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com