Waited for long’, SC to decide punishment for Vijay Mallya in Jan

Vijay Mallya. (File Photo: IANS)


New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it has waited for sufficiently long, and the process to award punishment to Vijay Mallya in a contempt of court, in which he was held guilty in July 2017, must get over. The top court has scheduled the matter for disposal in January, where it will decide the quantum of punishment for him.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, submitted a note by the Ministry of External Affairs for the court’s consideration.

A bench headed by Justice U.U. Lalit, citing the note, said that Mallya’s extradition proceedings have attained finality, as he has exhausted all avenues of appeal in the UK. However, certain confidential proceedings are going on and the UK has not disclosed the details of these proceedings. The top court noted that due to these proceedings Mallya’s presence could not be secured, despite its directions.

The bench said the process to award sentence to Mallya in the contempt of court matter must get over, as the top court has waited sufficiently for long. The top court said it is up to Mallya to appear in person or advance arguments through his counsel, but the matter has to see the light as it is getting adjourned from 2017, when he was found guilty of contempt. Citing that only sentencing is pending for the last four years, the bench said: “Matter in terms of directions issued by this court in its 2017 order shall now be listed on 18 January 2022.”

According to a judgment delivered on July 14, 2017, Mallya was found guilty of contempt for not paying Rs 9,000 crore worth of dues to the banks despite repeated directions. Additionally, he was also accused of not disclosing his assets and also secretly trying to dispose of the assets to defeat the purpose of recovery proceedings.

On October 6, last year, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has told the Supreme Court that the UK Home Office has intimated that there is a further legal issue which needs to be resolved before Vijay Mallya’s extradition takes place and this issue is outside and apart from the extradition process having effect under the UK law. The affidavit had said that Vijay Mallya’s surrender to India should, in principle, have been completed within 28 days after he lost the appeal against extradition. However, the UK Home Office intimated that there is further legal issue which needs to be resolved before Mallya’s extradition takes place.

On November 2, the top court had asked the Centre to file a status report on extradition of the fugitive businessman within six weeks. On January 18, the Centre had informed the Supreme Court that Vijay Mallya’s extradition has been raised at the highest political level, but the UK government has refused to share the details of the confidential proceedings delaying his extradition.IANS

Tata Sons moves SC against NCLAT order on Cyrus Mistry

Jan 2, 2019 New Delhi:  Tata Sons Thursday moved the Supreme Court challenging reinstatement of Cyrus Mistry as executive Chairman and director of Tata Sons and the three group companies...

‘Children of Indian citizens not to go to detention centres’

Jan 6, 2020 New Delhi: The Centre on Monday told the Supreme Court that children, whose parents have been given citizenship through NRC, will not be separated from their families...

Nirbhaya rapists to hang on Jan 22: Court

Jan 7, 2019 New Delhi: A Delhi court on Tuesday issued death warrants against all four convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya gang-rape and murder case with the convicts to be...

Nirbhaya case: First-ever execution of a quartet in Tihar’s history

By Sanjeev Kumar Singh Chauhan Jan 7, 2020 New Delhi: The horrific December 16, 2012 Nirbhaya rape-murder case transformed much in India. From laws on rape to relief and rehabilitation...

HC turns down plea on shifting protesters from Shaheen Bagh

New Delhi, Jan 10 (IANS) The Delhi High Court on Friday turned down a plea seeking shifting of CAA protesters in Shaheen Bagh area to some other place and removal...

SC limits its concern to finding balance between liberty & security of J&K people

Jan 10, 2020 New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday directed the administration of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) to view all its restrictive orders within a...

Internet access fundamental right but reasonable restrictions apply: SC

By Sumit Saxena Jan 10, 2020 New Delhi:The Supreme Court on Friday said the right to access the internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution as...

SC ruling on Kashmir curbs shuns mechanical usage of laws

Jan 12, 2019 New Delhi: Justice N.V. Ramana, in the recent verdict on the restrictions imposed in Jammu and Kashmir, has ruled on two crucial aspects - access to internet...

Kerala files suit in SC against CAA

Jan 14, 2020 Thiruvananthapuram: Kerala on Tuesday became the first state in the country to file a suit in the Supreme Court against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The suit...

You are behaving like Jama Masjid is in Pak: Court to Delhi Police

Jan 14, 2020 New Delhi: A Delhi court on Tuesday reprimanded the Delhi Police for failing to show any evidence against Bhim Army chief Chandrashekhar Azad who was arrested in...

SC dismisses two Nirbhaya convicts’ curative pleas

Jan 14, 2020 New Delhi: (IANS) The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed the curative petitions filed by two Nirbhaya gang rape and murder convicts - Vinay Kumar and Mukesh -...

AMU will lodge FIR against police, not asked for entering hostel:VCby

Jan 14, 2020 Aligarh: Under severe attack for brutal the police action against students inside the campus, Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) Vice Chancellor Professor Dr Tariq Mansoor on Tuesday announced...

Read Previous

25 who underwent cataract operation in Bihar’s Muzaffarpur lose eyesight

Read Next

Omicron concerns: Mumbai, Pune, Nashik postpone schools’ reopening

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com