SC asks Centre to ‘immediately’ decide on ‘Udaipur Files’ certification

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the Centre to “immediately” decide the revision pleas filed against the CBFC certification granted to the film ‘Udaipur Files’.

A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymala Bagchi was dealing with a plea filed by film producer Amit Johnny, who has challenged the Delhi High Court’s order that had temporarily stayed the release of the movie based on the Kanhaiya Lal murder case.

In a brief hearing, the Justice Kant-led Bench asked the panel constituted by the Centre under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act to decide the revision pleas “immediately without loss of time”.

Section 6 vests the Centre with adequate powers to declare a film to be uncertified or pass orders providing for interim measures, including suspension of the film from public exhibition.

Posting the matter for further hearing on July 21, the apex court remarked, “We can wait for some time. We are told that a committee has been formed, and the Union (government) is looking into it. We can have the benefit of the Union of India’s view. Suppose the Union says there is nothing wrong with the movie, then we will see that. If they recommend some cuts, then also we can peruse the same. If the Centre was not taking up the matter, then it was different.”

The film revolves around the brutal murder of Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor in Rajasthan’s Udaipur, in June 2022 by Mohammad Riyaz Attari and Ghaus Mohammad by slitting his throat.

One of the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case, Javed, had filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court and has sought a stay on the release of ‘Udaipur Files’, arguing that the release of the film could prejudice the ongoing trial proceedings pending before the Special NIA court.

A day before its scheduled release, the Delhi High Court, in its order passed on July 10, had temporarily halted the release of the controversial movie till the Centre decides the revision plea of the petitioners challenging the grant of the CBFC certification.

A Bench of Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Anish Dayal was dealing with a batch of pleas, including a plea filed by Maulana Arshad Madani, the President of the Islamic clerics’ body Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, seeking a direction to quash the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) certification granted to the film.

As per the petition filed by Maulana Arshad Madani, the CBFC certification was granted in violation of Section 5B of the Cinematograph Act, 1952 and the Guidelines for Certification of Films for Public Exhibition, since the release of the film ‘Udaipur Files’ has the potential to inflame communal tensions and disrupt public order, severely undermining the fabric of religious harmony in the country.

The Chief Justice Upadhyaya-led Bench allowed the petitioners as well as the general public to file within two days revision plea before the Union government under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act.

The Delhi High Court had asked the Centre to decide the revision pleas within a week after giving an opportunity of hearing to the producer.

Further, it had ordered that the prayer for interim relief, if made, will also be considered and decided.

IANS

 

‘Misdirecting itself’: SC raps Haryana SIT probing online posts of Ashoka University professor on Op Sindoor

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the Haryana Special Investigation Team (SIT) for unnecessarily broadening the scope of its probe into the two FIRs filed against Ali...

Nimisha Priya’s execution temporarily frozen, talks on ‘blood money’ underway: Counsel

New Delhi: In a significant development in the Nimisha Priya case, the scheduled execution of the Indian nurse in Yemen has been temporarily halted, her legal counsel Subhas Chandren confirmed...

Rahul Gandhi appears in Lucknow court, granted bail in defamation case

Lucknow: Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha and Raebareli Member of Parliament, Rahul Gandhi, appeared before the MP-MLA court in Lucknow on Tuesday in connection with a defamation case...

Can’t penalise 3rd parties who unknowingly buy properties attached by ED: Appellate Tribunal

New Delhi: In a landmark judgment, an Appellate Tribunal dealing with money laundering cases stated that if the ED fails to publicise or delays the attachment of an accused’s property,...

Congress flags five key objections to Special Intensive Revision in Bihar

New Delhi: Senior Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi on Saturday outlined five major concerns raised by the Congress with regard to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls...

Indian legal system badly in need of fixing: CJI

Hyderabad: Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai on Saturday said that the Indian legal system has been facing unique challenges and is badly in need of fixing. Delivering the convocation...

Punjab Assembly unanimously adopts resolution against deployment of CISF at BBMB projects

Chandigarh: The Punjab Assembly on Friday unanimously adopted a resolution against the deployment of Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) personnel at hydropower projects of the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB),...

No criminal offence in merely supporting Pakistan: Allahabad HC

New Delhi: The Allahabad High Court has ruled that merely showing support to Pakistan, without referring to any incident or mentioning the name of India, will not prima facie attract...

Calcutta HC seeks report from Union Home Ministry on charges of migrant workers from Bengal in Delhi being deported to Dhaka

Kolkata : A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court, on Friday, directed the Union Home Ministry to submit to the court a report on allegations that some migrant workers...

SC asks EC to consider if Aadhaar, Voter ID, Ration Cards could be used for verification in SIR

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Election Commission of India (ECI) to consider “in the interest of justice” if documents such as Aadhaar, Voter ID and Ration...

‘None of them are voters’, ECI objects to PILs against SIR exercise in Bihar

New Delhi: The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Thursday objected to the PILs filed by several NGOs and other political activists in the Supreme Court challenging its decision to...

SIR issue goes at the very roots of democracy, remarks SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday orally observed that the clutch of petitions challenging the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) decision to revise electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar raises...

Read Previous

‘Misdirecting itself’: SC raps Haryana SIT probing online posts of Ashoka University professor on Op Sindoor

Read Next

Ahead of Bangladesh polls, verbal crossfire erupts between political parties over reforms

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com