Karnataka hijab ban: SC considers setting up 3-judge bench

Supreme Court.

  • I will examine it. This is a three judge bench matter. We will allot a date: CJI Justice Chandrachud
  • With the SC delivering a split verdict in October 2022, the high court’s judgement still holds the field
  • Muslims, civil rights group are opposed to legal intervention on personal choice of dress, food

After the split judgment in the Karnataka hijab case, the Supreme Court on Monday said it will consider setting up a three-judge bench for the resolution of the case.

The two-judge bench on October 13 last year delivered opposing verdicts and urged the CJI to constitute an appropriate bench. The petitions challenged the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-run Karnataka’s ban on girls and women wearing hijab —an Islamic head covering— in classrooms.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandarchud and Justices V Ramasubramanian and JB Pardiwala took note of the submissions of Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora that an interim order was needed keeping in mind the practical examinations scheduled for some classes from February 6 in Karnataka, according to the Outlook.

Arora said, “This is the headscarf matter. The girls have practical examinations from February 6, 2023 and this matter needs to be listed for interim directions so that they can appear. The practical examinations will be held in government schools.”

Chandrachud said, “I will examine it. This is a three judge bench matter. We will allot a date.”

In the split verdict, Justice Hemant Gupta, since retired, had dismissed the appeals challenging the March 15 judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had refused to lift the ban. However, the other judge, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia held there will be no restriction on the wearing of hijab anywhere in the schools and colleges of the state.

Permitting a community to wear its religious symbols to schools will be an “antithesis to secularism”, Gupta had said, while Dhulia insisted that wearing the Muslim headscarf should simply be a “matter of choice”, according to Outlook.

Justice Dhulia was praised by civil rights groups and the Muslim community who have long been arguing that there cannot be any legal interference in an individual’s choice of dress and food.

On March 15, the high court dismissed the petitions filed by a section of Muslim students of the Government Pre-University Girls College in Karnataka’s Udupi seeking permission to wear the hijab inside classrooms.

The issue has snowballed into major controversy between the government and the opposition parties.

-INDIA NEWS STREAM

Can’t penalise 3rd parties who unknowingly buy properties attached by ED: Appellate Tribunal

New Delhi: In a landmark judgment, an Appellate Tribunal dealing with money laundering cases stated that if the ED fails to publicise or delays the attachment of an accused’s property,...

Congress flags five key objections to Special Intensive Revision in Bihar

New Delhi: Senior Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi on Saturday outlined five major concerns raised by the Congress with regard to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls...

Indian legal system badly in need of fixing: CJI

Hyderabad: Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai on Saturday said that the Indian legal system has been facing unique challenges and is badly in need of fixing. Delivering the convocation...

Punjab Assembly unanimously adopts resolution against deployment of CISF at BBMB projects

Chandigarh: The Punjab Assembly on Friday unanimously adopted a resolution against the deployment of Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) personnel at hydropower projects of the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB),...

No criminal offence in merely supporting Pakistan: Allahabad HC

New Delhi: The Allahabad High Court has ruled that merely showing support to Pakistan, without referring to any incident or mentioning the name of India, will not prima facie attract...

Calcutta HC seeks report from Union Home Ministry on charges of migrant workers from Bengal in Delhi being deported to Dhaka

Kolkata : A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court, on Friday, directed the Union Home Ministry to submit to the court a report on allegations that some migrant workers...

SC asks EC to consider if Aadhaar, Voter ID, Ration Cards could be used for verification in SIR

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Election Commission of India (ECI) to consider “in the interest of justice” if documents such as Aadhaar, Voter ID and Ration...

‘None of them are voters’, ECI objects to PILs against SIR exercise in Bihar

New Delhi: The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Thursday objected to the PILs filed by several NGOs and other political activists in the Supreme Court challenging its decision to...

SIR issue goes at the very roots of democracy, remarks SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday orally observed that the clutch of petitions challenging the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) decision to revise electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar raises...

Madras HC orders urgent action to remove non-consensual private videos of woman advocate

Chennai: In a deeply emotional and strongly worded order, the Madras High Court on Wednesday directed the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to take urgent steps to...

SC to hear on pleas against electoral rolls revision in Bihar on July 10

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a clutch of petitions challenging the Election Commission’s decision to revise electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar on July 10. A...

CBI takes over probe into murder of 3 BJP workers in Bengal’s Sandeshkhali, files FIR

Kolkata: As directed by a single-judge bench of the Calcutta High Court last week, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has taken over the probe into the murder of three...

Read Previous

Mohammed Shami ordered to pay monthly alimony to estranged wife

Read Next

‘Surprise move’: Maharashtra guv Bhagat Singh Koshyari offers to quit

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com