‘Unlawful, vitiated’, Justice Nagarathna on demonetisation of Rs 500 & Rs 1,000 currency notes

New Delhi : Supreme Court judge Justice B.V. Nagarathna, who dissented with the majority view on the Centre’s 2016 demonetisation decision, said the demonetisation of the Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes was unlawful and vitiated.

Justice Nagarathna said the objective of the Central government may have been sound, but the manner in which set objectives were achieved and the procedure followed for the same, was “not in accordance with law…”

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice S.A. Nazeer and comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian, and B.V. Nagarathna pronounced the judgment on a clutch of petitions challenging the Centre’s 2016 decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 denominations.

The top court affirmed the Centre’s 2016 decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 denominations with a 4:1 majority.

In her minority judgment, Justice Nagarathna held that the demonetisation of the Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes was vitiated and unlawful.

Justice Nagarathna said: “I am of the considered view that impugned notification dated November 8, 2016…is unlawful. In the circumstances the action of demonetisation of all currency notes Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes is vitiated…”

Justice Nagarathna emphasized that she is not questioning the ‘noble objectives’ of the exercise itself, but only the legal viewpoint and status quo ante cannot be restored now since the action occurred in 2016.

She noted that there was no independent application of mind by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), and the entire exercise was carried out in 24 hours and added that the power of the Central government being vast has to be exercised through a plenary legislation rather than by an executive act by issuance of notification.

“It is necessary that Parliament, which consists of the representatives of the people of the country, discusses the matter and thereafter, approves the matter,” she said.

She further added that the proposal originated from the Centre while the RBI’s opinion was sought and such an opinion given by the RBI cannot be construed as a recommendation under section 26(2) of the RBI Act.

Justice Nagarathna said: “Parliament is often referred to as a nation in miniature. It is the basis of democracy… Parliament, which is the centre of democracy, cannot be left aloof in a matter of such critical importance.”
IANS

Can’t penalise 3rd parties who unknowingly buy properties attached by ED: Appellate Tribunal

New Delhi: In a landmark judgment, an Appellate Tribunal dealing with money laundering cases stated that if the ED fails to publicise or delays the attachment of an accused’s property,...

Congress flags five key objections to Special Intensive Revision in Bihar

New Delhi: Senior Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi on Saturday outlined five major concerns raised by the Congress with regard to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls...

Indian legal system badly in need of fixing: CJI

Hyderabad: Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai on Saturday said that the Indian legal system has been facing unique challenges and is badly in need of fixing. Delivering the convocation...

Punjab Assembly unanimously adopts resolution against deployment of CISF at BBMB projects

Chandigarh: The Punjab Assembly on Friday unanimously adopted a resolution against the deployment of Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) personnel at hydropower projects of the Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB),...

No criminal offence in merely supporting Pakistan: Allahabad HC

New Delhi: The Allahabad High Court has ruled that merely showing support to Pakistan, without referring to any incident or mentioning the name of India, will not prima facie attract...

Calcutta HC seeks report from Union Home Ministry on charges of migrant workers from Bengal in Delhi being deported to Dhaka

Kolkata : A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court, on Friday, directed the Union Home Ministry to submit to the court a report on allegations that some migrant workers...

SC asks EC to consider if Aadhaar, Voter ID, Ration Cards could be used for verification in SIR

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Election Commission of India (ECI) to consider “in the interest of justice” if documents such as Aadhaar, Voter ID and Ration...

‘None of them are voters’, ECI objects to PILs against SIR exercise in Bihar

New Delhi: The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Thursday objected to the PILs filed by several NGOs and other political activists in the Supreme Court challenging its decision to...

SIR issue goes at the very roots of democracy, remarks SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday orally observed that the clutch of petitions challenging the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) decision to revise electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar raises...

Madras HC orders urgent action to remove non-consensual private videos of woman advocate

Chennai: In a deeply emotional and strongly worded order, the Madras High Court on Wednesday directed the Union Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to take urgent steps to...

SC to hear on pleas against electoral rolls revision in Bihar on July 10

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a clutch of petitions challenging the Election Commission’s decision to revise electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar on July 10. A...

CBI takes over probe into murder of 3 BJP workers in Bengal’s Sandeshkhali, files FIR

Kolkata: As directed by a single-judge bench of the Calcutta High Court last week, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has taken over the probe into the murder of three...

Read Previous

Sheezan Khan’s kin hit back: Never forced Tunisha to embrace Islam

Read Next

Dissenting judgement on demonetisation points out irregularities: Chidambaram on SC verdict

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com