‘Highly irresponsible’: SC castigates Nishikant Dubey over remarks on judiciary

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has castigated BJP Lok Sabha member Nishikant Dubey over his “highly irresponsible” and “absurd” comments on the top court and the Chief Justice of India (CJI).

Amid ongoing hearings on the constitutionality of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, Nishikant Dubey, a Member of Parliament from Jharkhand’s Godda, during an interview, had said that “Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna is responsible for all the civil wars happening in India” and “to provoke the religious war in this country, only and only the Supreme Court is responsible”.

“In our opinion, the comments were highly irresponsible and reflect a penchant to attract attention by casting aspersions on the Supreme Court of India and the Judges of the Supreme Court,” said a bench of CJI Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, in its order, uploaded on the website of the apex court on Thursday.

Though the apex court refrained from entertaining a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking contempt of court action against Dubey, it said that courts need not protect their verdicts and decisions by taking recourse to the power of contempt.

However, the CJI Khanna-led Bench stressed that any attempt to spread communal hatred or indulge in hate speech must be dealt with an iron hand.

“Hate speech cannot be tolerated as it leads to loss of dignity and self-worth of the targeted group members, contributes to disharmony amongst groups, and erodes tolerance and open-mindedness, which is a must for a multi-cultural society committed to the idea of equality,” it said, adding that any attempt to cause alienation or humiliation of the targeted group is a criminal offence and must be dealt with accordingly.

In its order, the top court, after examining Dubey’s statement, said that the contents of his assertions tend to scandalise and lower the authority of the Supreme Court, if not interfere or tend to interfere with the judicial proceedings pending before the court, and have the tendency to interfere and obstruct the administration of justice.

Observing that there is no ‘civil war’ in India, the apex court said that judicial decisions are made in accordance with legal principles and not in keeping with political, religious or community considerations.

“Surely, courts and judges have shoulders broad enough and an implicit trust that the people would perceive and recognise when criticism or critique is biased, scandalous and ill-intentioned,” the CJI Khanna-led Bench added.

“We are of the firm opinion that courts are not as fragile as flowers to wither and wilt under such ludicrous statements. We do not believe that the confidence in and credibility of the courts in the eyes of the public can be shaken by such absurd statements, though it can be said without the shadow of doubt that there is a desire and deliberate attempt to do so,” said the top court.

The PIL filed by advocate Vishal Tiwari had said that the entire contents of Dubey’s interview were full of derogatory speech towards the judiciary and the Supreme Court. “Such acts amount to an offence punishable under BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) and also under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971,” it stated.

Refusing to entertain the plea seeking contempt action against Dubey, the CJI Khanna-led Bench, on Monday, had said: “We will pass a short order. We will not be entertaining it, but we will give a short order expressing our views.”

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had dissociated itself from Nishikant Dubey’s comments against the Supreme Court, clarifying that the statements were “personal opinions” and do not reflect the party’s stance.

In a post on X, BJP chief J.P. Nadda distanced the party from the comments by the MPs. “The BJP has nothing to do with the statements made by BJP MPs Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma on the judiciary and the Chief Justice of the country. These are their personal statements, but the BJP neither agrees with such statements nor does it ever support such statements. The BJP completely rejects these statements,” Nadda had said.

IANS

 

SC discloses asset details of judges on official website

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has decided to place assets of the apex court judges in the public domain by uploading these on its official website. “The Full Court of...

Cash at judge’s residence: SC ‘in-house’ panel submits probe report to CJI

New Delhi: The Supreme Court-appointed enquiry panel formed to probe into cash discovery allegations against Justice Yashwant Verma has submitted its report to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv...

Police will initiate suitable action against singer Sonu Nigam: K’taka Home Min

Bengaluru: Karnataka Home Minister G. Parameshwara stated on Monday that the state police would initiate appropriate action against popular singer Sonu Nigam for making a controversial statement linking the demand...

Justice Gavai-led Bench to now hear pleas against Waqf (Amendment) Act

New Delhi: A Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, on Monday directed that the clutch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf...

SC temporarily halts deportation of a family to Pakistan

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday came to the rescue of a family detained for deportation to Pakistan, after it claimed that they were holding Indian passports and Aadhaar...

Mob lynching: Three police officers suspended in K’taka

Bengaluru: The Karnataka Police department has suspended three police officers including an Inspector on charges of negligence in connection with an incident of mob lynching in the state. The department...

‘Sharbat Jihad’ row: Delhi HC slams Ramdev for fresh video, warns of contempt action

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday took strong exception to Patanjali founder Baba Ramdev's fresh video targeting pharmaceutical and food company Hamdard's popular drink Rooh Afza. A single-judge...

‘100 pc fruit juice’ claim by Dabur violates law, misleading: FSSAI to Delhi HC

New Delhi: The claim made by FMCG giant Dabur that its range of fruit beverages is made “100 per cent” from fruits violates rules and regulations and is also misleading...

Justice BR Gavai appointed as next Chief Justice of India

New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday cleared the appointment of Supreme Court judge, Justice B.R. Gavai, as the next Chief Justice of India (CJI). "In exercise of the powers conferred...

Cannot allow disclosure of Pegasus report touching security, sovereignty of the country: SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday disfavoured public release of the report of the court-appointed panel, which was formed to look into the Pegasus snooping allegations. A bench of...

‘India Got Latent’ row: SC orders release of Ranveer Allahbadia’s passport

New Delhi: In another relief to popular YouTube Ranveer Allahbadia, the Supreme Court on Monday directed the return of his passport. Allahbadia, who made obscene and offensive remarks about parents...

SC refuses to entertain fresh plea against Waqf (Amendment) Act

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a fresh petition challenging the recent amendments to the Waqf Act, 1995. A bench, headed by CJI Sanjiv Khanna, told...

Read Previous

India negates Pak drone/missile attack on over 15 places, knocks out Lahore air defence system

Read Next

False alarm: PIB refutes video claiming Pakistani strike on Indian military base

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com