Karnataka hijab ban: SC considers setting up 3-judge bench

Supreme Court.

  • I will examine it. This is a three judge bench matter. We will allot a date: CJI Justice Chandrachud
  • With the SC delivering a split verdict in October 2022, the high court’s judgement still holds the field
  • Muslims, civil rights group are opposed to legal intervention on personal choice of dress, food

After the split judgment in the Karnataka hijab case, the Supreme Court on Monday said it will consider setting up a three-judge bench for the resolution of the case.

The two-judge bench on October 13 last year delivered opposing verdicts and urged the CJI to constitute an appropriate bench. The petitions challenged the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-run Karnataka’s ban on girls and women wearing hijab —an Islamic head covering— in classrooms.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandarchud and Justices V Ramasubramanian and JB Pardiwala took note of the submissions of Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora that an interim order was needed keeping in mind the practical examinations scheduled for some classes from February 6 in Karnataka, according to the Outlook.

Arora said, “This is the headscarf matter. The girls have practical examinations from February 6, 2023 and this matter needs to be listed for interim directions so that they can appear. The practical examinations will be held in government schools.”

Chandrachud said, “I will examine it. This is a three judge bench matter. We will allot a date.”

In the split verdict, Justice Hemant Gupta, since retired, had dismissed the appeals challenging the March 15 judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had refused to lift the ban. However, the other judge, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia held there will be no restriction on the wearing of hijab anywhere in the schools and colleges of the state.

Permitting a community to wear its religious symbols to schools will be an “antithesis to secularism”, Gupta had said, while Dhulia insisted that wearing the Muslim headscarf should simply be a “matter of choice”, according to Outlook.

Justice Dhulia was praised by civil rights groups and the Muslim community who have long been arguing that there cannot be any legal interference in an individual’s choice of dress and food.

On March 15, the high court dismissed the petitions filed by a section of Muslim students of the Government Pre-University Girls College in Karnataka’s Udupi seeking permission to wear the hijab inside classrooms.

The issue has snowballed into major controversy between the government and the opposition parties.

-INDIA NEWS STREAM

Patna court stays arrest of Khan Sir in coaching centre firing case

Patna: A Patna court on Tuesday granted interim relief to popular educator Faisal Khan, widely known as Khan Sir, by staying his arrest in connection with the recent coaching centre...

SC invokes extraordinary powers to acquit POCSO convict after victim marries him, seeks case closure

New Delhi: Invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to ensure "complete justice", the Supreme Court has set aside the conviction of a man sentenced under the...

Setback for Jharkhand CM as court dismisses his discharge plea in PMLA case

  Ranchi:Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren suffered a major legal setback on Monday after a special court hearing cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) rejected his discharge...

SC closes WFI plea against Vinesh Phogat’s Asian Games trials participation

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday disposed of as infructuous the Wrestling Federation of India's (WFI) plea challenging a Delhi High Court order that had allowed wrestler Vinesh Phogat...

Centre appoints five new Supreme Court judges

New Delhi: Acting on the recommendation of the Supreme Court Collegium, the Centre on Monday cleared the elevation of four High Court Chief Justices and senior advocate V. Mohana as...

Assam Assembly passes UCC Bill; CM Sarma says law to come into effect in 6 months

Guwahati: The Assam Assembly on Wednesday passed the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Bill, with Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma stating that the legislation would now be sent to Governor Lakshman...

Centre urges SC to transfer to itself pleas against Transgender Amendment Act, 2026

New Delhi: The Centre on Wednesday urged the Supreme Court to transfer to itself petitions pending before various High Courts challenging the constitutional validity of the Transgender Persons (Protection of...

‘We are satisfied’: SC says SIR within constitutional powers of ECI; advances free and fair elections

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the Election Commission of India’s decision to undertake a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, holding that the revision exercise was...

Life term for 12 in lynching case; Kerala HC raises sentence, awards Rs 30 lakh to mother

Thiruvananthapuram: In a landmark verdict in the Attappadi Madhu lynching case that once shook the conscience of the country, the Kerala High Court on Monday enhanced the punishment of 12...

Sad they have not learnt their lesson: SC on NEET-UG 2026 row

New Delhi:  The Supreme Court on Monday issued notices to the Centre, the National Testing Agency (NTA) and other authorities on pleas seeking structural reforms in the conduct of the...

Twisha Sharma death case: MP High Court orders second autopsy by AIIMS Delhi

  Jabalpur/Bhopal,: In a significant development in the alleged dowry death case of Twisha Sharma, the Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday ordered a second autopsy of her mortal remains...

Mohammed Shami acquitted in cheque bounce case filed by estranged wife

Kolkata: Indian cricketer Mohammed Shami has been acquitted by the Alipore Court in a cheque bounce case filed by his estranged wife, Hasin Jahan.   Jahan had alleged that a...

Read Previous

Mohammed Shami ordered to pay monthly alimony to estranged wife

Read Next

‘Surprise move’: Maharashtra guv Bhagat Singh Koshyari offers to quit

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com