All about SC’s split verdict on hijab

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday gave a split judgment in a plea challenging the Karnataka high court order prohibiting the wearing of hijab inside classrooms in pre-university colleges. The 1:1 judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justice Hemant Gupta and Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia. While Justice Gupta upheld the Karnataka government circular and dismissed the appeals, Justice Dhulia allowed all the appeals and set aside the Karnataka High Court judgment. Given the “divergence of opinion”, the top court directed placing the appeals before the Chief Justice of India for the constitution of a larger bench.

‘Divergence of opinion’

Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia: “It’s ultimately a matter of choice and nothing else. One thing which was topmost for me was the education of the girl child.” He underlined that the main thrust of his judgment is that this entire concept of essential religious practices, in his opinion, was not essential to the disposal of the dispute. “The Karnataka High Court probably took a wrong path there. It is ultimately a matter of choice. Nothing more, nothing less,” he said. He further said that the thing which was uppermost in mind was the education of girl children. “It is a common knowledge that a girl child primarily in rural and semi-rural areas has a lot of difficulties, they have to do daily chores before she goes to school. There are other difficulties as well. Are we making her life any better? That was also a question in my mind,” he said.

Justice Hemant Gupta: “There is divergence of opinion,” said Justice Gupta, who framed and answered 11 questions in his judgment for dismissing the plea. He said he agrees with the Karnataka High Court’s order. Some of the questions and answers that Justice Gupta cited before dismissing the pleas, according to the legal news website Bar and Bench, include whether the government order has infringed upon the fundamental right of students and whether wearing the hijab is an essential religious practice under Islam. “The answer, according to me, is against the appellant. I dismiss the appeal,” Justice Gupta said.

Hijab ban to continue in Karnataka educational institutions till SC verdict

Since the SC delivered a split verdict and referred the matter to a larger bench, the Karnataka government decision to ban hijab in state’s education institutions will continue. Karnataka Primary and Secondary Education Minister B C Nagesh said the Karnataka High Court order upholding the state government’s ban on hijab on school and college campuses will remain valid. He added the Karnataka government will wait for the verdict by a higher bench. News agency PIT quoted him as saying, “The Karnataka High Court order will remain valid. Hence, in all our schools and colleges Karnataka education act and rule, there will be no scope for any religious symbols. So our schools and colleges will run as per the Karnataka High Court order. Children will have to come to the schools accordingly.”

Muslims react

All India Muslim Personal Law Board member Yasmin Farooqui said that the two judges had different views. This shows that two people may have different opinions. AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi has targeted the BJP for making it “an unnecessary issue”. He hit out at the Karnataka high court and the state government, underscoring that the HC misused Quranic commentaries. “It is a matter of the fundamental right of an individual,” he said. “If you allow a Sikh boy in uniform to wear a turban and a Hindu girl to wear vermilion and mangalsutra, but Muslim girls are not allowed to wear a hijab, it is discrimination,” he said. Owaisi argued that if children do not see each other’s religious traditions then how they will understand diversity.

Context

The issue started after the Government PU College in Udupi barred girl students wearing the hijab from entering classrooms. The protest demonstrations against the move spread to other parts of the state, and then captured the nation’s attention. On January 1 this year, six girl students of a college in Udupi attended a press conference held by the Campus Front of India (CFI) in the coastal town protesting against the college authorities. The BJP-ruled Karnataka government banned students from wearing hijab on campus on February 5. It was challenged by Muslim girl students in the Karnataka High Court. On March 15, the HC dismissed petitions filed by some Muslim students.

—–INDIA NEWS STREAM

Delhi High Court rejects plea seeking reopening of CBSE revaluation portal

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Friday refused to issue any urgent directions to reopen the CBSE's digital portal for the revaluation of answer sheets of aggrieved Class 12...

Twisha Sharma case: Father seeks probe into role of legal aid lawyers, files complaint in MP HC

Bhopal: As the CBI probe continues into the death of actress Twisha Sharma, her father has filed a complaint in the Madhya Pradesh High Court demanding an inquiry into the...

SC to hear Meenakshi Natarajan’s plea against Rajya Sabha nomination rejection tomorrow

New Delhi: The Supreme Court agreed to hear tomorrow a plea filed by Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan challenging the rejection of her nomination papers for the Rajya Sabha election from...

Patna court stays arrest of Khan Sir in coaching centre firing case

Patna: A Patna court on Tuesday granted interim relief to popular educator Faisal Khan, widely known as Khan Sir, by staying his arrest in connection with the recent coaching centre...

SC invokes extraordinary powers to acquit POCSO convict after victim marries him, seeks case closure

New Delhi: Invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to ensure "complete justice", the Supreme Court has set aside the conviction of a man sentenced under the...

Setback for Jharkhand CM as court dismisses his discharge plea in PMLA case

  Ranchi:Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren suffered a major legal setback on Monday after a special court hearing cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) rejected his discharge...

SC closes WFI plea against Vinesh Phogat’s Asian Games trials participation

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday disposed of as infructuous the Wrestling Federation of India's (WFI) plea challenging a Delhi High Court order that had allowed wrestler Vinesh Phogat...

Centre appoints five new Supreme Court judges

New Delhi: Acting on the recommendation of the Supreme Court Collegium, the Centre on Monday cleared the elevation of four High Court Chief Justices and senior advocate V. Mohana as...

Assam Assembly passes UCC Bill; CM Sarma says law to come into effect in 6 months

Guwahati: The Assam Assembly on Wednesday passed the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Bill, with Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma stating that the legislation would now be sent to Governor Lakshman...

Centre urges SC to transfer to itself pleas against Transgender Amendment Act, 2026

New Delhi: The Centre on Wednesday urged the Supreme Court to transfer to itself petitions pending before various High Courts challenging the constitutional validity of the Transgender Persons (Protection of...

‘We are satisfied’: SC says SIR within constitutional powers of ECI; advances free and fair elections

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the Election Commission of India’s decision to undertake a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, holding that the revision exercise was...

Life term for 12 in lynching case; Kerala HC raises sentence, awards Rs 30 lakh to mother

Thiruvananthapuram: In a landmark verdict in the Attappadi Madhu lynching case that once shook the conscience of the country, the Kerala High Court on Monday enhanced the punishment of 12...

Read Previous

Is World War-III on the horizon if Ukraine joins NATO?

Read Next

Parents of Bihar’s Sitamarhi district sell their daughter in fair

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com