SC sets aside Punjab and Haryana HC order to demolish unauthorised constructions in Gurugram’s DLF

New Delhi: In a major relief to thousands of homeowners across DLF Phases 1 to 5 in Gurugram, the Supreme Court has set aside an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that had directed the demolition of unauthorised constructions and sealing of commercial establishments in residential zones.

A Bench of Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi, while restoring the writ petitions before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, ruled that no adverse action can be taken without hearing the affected parties. The Justice Maheshwari-led Bench held that “opportunity of hearing is a sine qua non for fair administration of justice”, adding that the impugned order had been passed “without joining the appellants as parties in the writ petition.”

The apex court said that the High Court’s directions —ordering the closure of 172 pending civil suits and mandating demolitions within two months—had serious implications for property owners who were neither heard nor impleaded as parties. The decision came on a batch of special leave petitions (SLPs) filed by Gurugram residents challenging the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s February 13 order in a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the DLF City Resident Welfare Association (RWA) in 2021.

The SLPs argued that the High Court’s directions were passed “without affording opportunity of hearing” and in disregard of ongoing civil proceedings concerning ownership and legality of the constructions.

The Supreme Court, while acknowledging that illegal constructions cannot be protected, observed that any illegality must be dealt with in accordance with due process of law. “Unauthorised or illegal construction, commercial use of residential property, contrary to the norms, rules and regulations, cannot be protected. But the determination of such a fact ought to be made by the authorities affording due opportunity to the owners and occupiers,” observed the Justice Maheshwari-led Bench.

The apex directed the restoration of the writ petitions before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, granting two weeks for affected individuals to file applications to join the proceedings. “It goes without saying that the opportunity of hearing is a sine qua non for fair administration of justice, and the observations of the court should not adjudicate the rights of any parties unheard,” the order said.

The Supreme Court also asked the Haryana government to give “wide publicity” to its order so that all affected residents could approach the Punjab and Haryana High Court. It further asked the High Court to decide the petitions at the earliest, as far as possible, within six months after affording opportunity to all concerned.”

Earlier, a February order from the Punjab and Haryana High Court had prompted the Town and Country Planning Department (DTCP) to prepare for major sealing and demolition operations.

Following the High Court order, the DTCP had identified around 2,100 properties across DLF Phases 1-5 for alleged violations, including residential buildings being used for commercial purposes such as paying guest accommodations, guest houses, and shops. Later, the order was temporarily stayed by the Supreme Court.

–IANS

pds/uk

SC seeks CAQM affidavit on worsening air quality in Delhi-NCR

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) to file an affidavit detailing the measures undertaken to prevent Delhi-NCR’s air quality from deteriorating,...

Mehbooba Mufti in HC, seeks repatriation of undertrial prisoners lodged in jails outside J&K

Jammu: Former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister and president of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Mehbooba Mufti, on Monday appeared before the high court in Jammu in connection with a...

‘Love, not lust’: Supreme Court quashes POCSO conviction

New Delhi: In an extraordinary exercise of its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, aimed at doing “complete justice,” the Supreme Court of India has quashed the conviction and...

Petition in Calcutta HC seeks court-monitored SIR in Bengal

Kolkata: A petition has been filed in the Calcutta High Court on Friday, seeking a court-monitored Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in West Bengal. Calcutta High Court’s division bench of Justice...

SC lays down guidelines on summoning lawyers by investigating agencies

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday laid down safeguards restricting investigating agencies from summoning advocates representing accused persons, observing that such actions could infringe upon the fundamental rights of...

Justice Surya Kant appointed next Chief Justice of India

New Delhi: The Centre on Thursday cleared the appointment of Supreme Court judge, Justice Surya Kant, as the next Chief Justice of India (CJI). "In exercise of the powers conferred...

Karnataka HC adjourns RSS plea for holding event till Nov 7; Sangh submits affidavit seeking Centre’s protection

Kalaburagi: The Karnataka High Court on Thursday asked the state government to convene a peace meeting between the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and 10 other organisations in Bengaluru and adjourned...

Delhi HC quashes 2008 FIR against activist Prof. Madhu Kishwar

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has quashed a 17-year-old attempt to murder case lodged against social activist and academic Prof. Madhu Kishwar, observing that the FIR appeared to be...

K’taka HC seeks report on use of Rs 7,093cr beggary cess; flags child begging menace

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court on Monday expressed serious concern over the continued prevalence of child begging in the state and sought an explanation on how Rs 7,093 crore collected...

CJI Gavai recommends Justice Surya Kant’s name as successor

New Delhi: Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R. Gavai on Monday recommended the name of Justice Surya Kant as his successor to the Centre, paving the way for Justice...

2020 Delhi riots: SC pulls up police for delay in filing response to bail pleas in ‘larger conspiracy’ case

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday pulled up the Delhi Police for seeking additional time to file its counter-affidavit in the bail petitions filed by student activists Umar Khalid,...

Cryptocurrency ‘property’ under Indian law, capable of ownership and trust: Madras HC

New Delhi: In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court has held that cryptocurrency qualifies as “property” under Indian law, an asset capable of being owned, enjoyed, and held in...

Read Previous

Jaipur tragedy: Rajasthan CM orders cancellation of licenses for drunk driving

Read Next

Bihar Anjuman celebrates 21 years of grass-roots philanthropy, hosts its annual event

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com