Right to protest fundamental right, but blocking road a concern: SC

Feb 17, 2020

New Delhi:The Supreme Court on Monday said that right to protest is a fundamental right, but it is troubling to see protesters blocking the road at Shaheen Bagh, as it may set a bad precedent and spur action by other groups resulting in chaos. It also suggested that the Shaheen Bagh protest may be shifted to an alternate venue.

The top court appointed three interlocutors led by senior advocate Sanjay Hegde to talk to the Shaheen Bagh protesters regarding shifting the protest site and file a report in the court. Senior advocate Sadhna Ramachandran and former chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah are the other two interlocutors.

A bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice K.M. Joseph, citing replication of protests involving blocking of public roads, said: “We are concerned as to what will happen if people start hitting the streets and blocking the roads while protesting.”

“Reasons must prevail upon them, as we are concerned about the blocking of the road,” it added.

The court suggested that Delhi Police may offer an alternative site to the protesters at Shaheen Bagh.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta contended before the court that the protesters can’t continue blocking roads on grounds of not getting an alternative site. To this, the court replied: “It is a fundamental right of the people to protest and people can protest.”

Mehta also contended that the message that every institution has been kneeling and praying to the protesters should not go out. Justice Joseph queried Mehta, “Then why did the Centre not take steps before this matter was brought before the top court. Why didn’t you act in the last 68 days?”

“For some reasons, you have not gone there. If nothing works out, we will leave it to you,” the bench told Mehta, who insisted that talks were held with welfare and market associations to lift restrictions on the road.

The observation from the apex court came while hearing the petitions filed by advocate Amit Sahni and BJP leader Nand Kishore Garg, seeking the removal of the protesters to end the road blockade.

The court said the protesters are aggrieved by a particular legislation (Citizenship Amendment Act). The challenge to this Act is pending before the top court.

“They may get favourable or unfavourable judgement… Our intrinsic concern is if everybody starts blocking roads or public areas, the question is where to protest. It should not happen on the streets. If another section occupies another road, that is the issue,” the court observed.

The top court said this may lead to chaos. “People may have strong views. The thing troubling us is blocking of the road,” said the court.

Mehta also submitted that protesters are using women and children at the protest site as a shield.

The court named Hegde to act as an interlocutor and asked him to seek assistance from former Habibullah and Ramachandran. Habibullah, along with Bhim Army Chief Chandrashekhar Azad, has filed an intervention application on the matter.

The court also observed that the authorities should favourably consider this aspect of the right to protest. The top court put the petitions seeking direction to Delhi Police to remove the road blockade at Shaheen Bagh for further consideration on February 24. IANS

SC reserves decision on TN govt’s plea against Governor withholding assent to Bills

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday reserved its verdict on a writ petition filed by the Tamil Nadu government claiming that the Governor has positioned himself as a "political...

SC asks if TN Governor could simply sit over Bills passed by Assembly

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Attorney General, the top-most law officer of the Centre, if the Tamil Nadu Governor could simply sit over the Bills passed...

Gujarat govt withdraws sedition cases against Patidar leaders

Ahmedabad: The Gujarat government has withdrawn sedition and other serious cases filed against Patidar movement leaders, including Hardik Patel, Dilip Sabva, Alpesh Kathiriya, and Lalji Patel. The decision, announced by...

K’taka HC refuses to entertain Yediyurappa’s plea to quash POCSO case; gives temporary relief

Bengaluru: In a setback to former Karnataka Chief Minister and BJP Central Parliamentary Committee member B.S. Yediyurappa, the Karnataka High Court has refused to quash charges against him under a...

‘Raise this before Parliament’: SC refuses to entertain PIL challenging laws ‘targeting men’

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking direction to declare unconstitutional laws primarily "targeting men" and "unfairly presuming men as aggressors in domestic...

Rajasthan introduces new Bill in Assembly to curb unlawful religious conversions

Jaipur: The Bhajan Lal Sharma-led Bharatiya Janata Party government tabled the Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Bill, 2025, in the ongoing Budget Session of the Assembly on Monday....

Waqf Bill: All complaints, amendments have been included, says Pal; dismisses Oppn claims

New Delhi: Jagdambika Pal, the Chairman of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, responded to the Opposition's concerns on Monday regarding the committee's meetings and...

Maha Kumbh stampede: PIL in SC seeks action against officials

New Delhi: Following the tragic stampede at the Maha Kumbh in which at least 30 people were killed and around 60 others injured, a public interest litigation (PIL) has been...

Honour killing case: Karnataka court sentences woman’s brothers, uncles to death

Gadag (Karnataka):The Gadag District and Sessions Court in Karnataka sentenced four men to the death penalty on Thursday after finding them guilty in an honour killing case. The men had...

‘Impermissible’: SC rules out residence-based reservation in PG medical courses

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that residence-based reservation in Post Graduate (PG) medical courses under state quota is constitutionally invalid. A bench, headed by Justice Hrishikesh Roy,...

Case against Kejriwal under Disaster Management Act, says Haryana Minister

Chandigarh: Haryana Revenue and Disaster Management Minister Vipul Goel said on Wednesday that the state government has taken strong cognisance of the statement by former Delhi Chief Minister and Aam...

RG Kar protest: SC passes protection order for doctors who returned to work after August 22 last year

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed hospitals and medical colleges across the country to not penalise doctors and medical professionals, who participated in protests against the rape and...

Read Previous

Congress asks Kamal Nath, Scindia to sort out differences

Read Next

Koregaon-Bhima: Maharashtra to conduct parallel probe

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com