Mandatory fulfilling of manifesto promises key areas of electoral reforms

March 21, 2019

New Delhi: The Election Commission has fixed the outer time limit for release of political party manifestos for 2019 General Elections as 48 hours before polling. The bar on declaration of manifestos in
the last two days before election is now brought under the Model Code of Conduct Part VIII
relating to Guidelines on Manifestos.

The rule is significant as elections are drawing closer and campaigns are growing more and more
vigorous, but most of the parties have not yet released their manifestos outlining their policies
and programmes. Hundreds of meetings are taking place and countless promises are extended
orally, but written promises are coming very slow. The BJP released its 2014 manifesto on the
day of polling in first phase!

Under this rule, in the multi-phase polls of 2019, the 48-hour ban — the silence period — will
apply before each polling date. During this period, direct or indirect way of soliciting support for
parties or candidates including release of manifestos in concerned constituencies is prohibited.
Though very important to get votes, manifestos come after alliance formation, and delayed as
much as possible. They are gaining importance with increasing people’s awareness, but losing
meaning because of alliances of parties with contrary views.

Asserting that it had fulfilled 520 out of the 549 assurances given before 2014 election, the BJP
is working on a Report Card of its performance.

This time, election manifesto labelled “Sankalp Patra” is given special importance by the BJP
as the focus of electioneering. The process of preparing the document is democratised to make it
a people’s exercise. The Party president went round the country seeking people’s views and
involving them in deciding the framework of what the party claims to be the “New India” they
want. In 2014, the BJP came up with the idea of launching a website to seek suggestions from
people. Later, social media came to play a significant role in assembly elections.

The Congress has also launched a website to gather suggestions for drawing up its election
manifesto. It is holding wide consultations with the public known as Jan Awaaz (people’s voice).
The word “manifesto”, derived from the Latin “manifestum”, means clear or conspicuous.
World famous manifestos include the United States Declaration of Independence (1776),
Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizens (1789) after the French Revolution, The
Communist Manifesto (1848) issued by Karl Marx and Friedrick Engels, and the Anarchist
Manifesto (1850).

In British election campaigns, launch of party manifestos is considered a decisive moment
conveying to the electorate what they can expect from different parties. Manifestos are not only
promises to capture votes, but they also set the agenda for the government if the party forms the
government. In this way, they are commitments of the parties far different from platform
promises.

One of the principles agreed in 1911 in Britain states that: “Any tabled bill set out in the
governing body’s manifesto may be subjected to possible short delay, but pass, but anything else
would be subject to full debate”. The rule was clarified by Lord Salisbury in 1945 to prevent
House of Lords blocking any government legislation promised in the election manifesto.

Intra-party differences are perceptible in general election manifestos at the British, Scottish, and
Welsh levels showing sub-national differences. National identity is prominent in Scottish and
Welsh manifestos of the same party. State-wide parties — Conservatives, Labour, and Liberal
Democrats — now prefer to produce detailed manifestos separately for each of the three countries
that make up the Great Britain.

British parliamentarians hold that manifestos have a quasi-constitutional authority in the
unwritten British Constitution and parties are expected to stick to the policies enshrined in them.
This document is generally very long. The manifestos of Labour, Conservative, and Liberal
Democracy contained over 26,000 words in 2015.

Writing party manifesto is taken up by parties as a serious work in Britain. In the Labour party,
for example, the Parliamentary Labour Party, trade unions, constituency labour parties, and
affiliated societies take part in preparing the document and it must be formally endorsed by all
stakeholders at a special meeting of the National Executive Committee. Conservatives, on the
contrary, are flexible in giving control of their manifesto to leaders at the central party
organisation almost entirely.

However, party manifestos cannot be taken as agreed bonds. In course of time, they have lost
credibility and in many respects have become a mere piece of paper as a CJI remarked. Judiciary
has no authority to ensure parties’ compliance with the manifestos. Governance is also not a
simple matter to carry out any wishful ideas that may come to political leaders.
The Model Code of Conduct in India prohibits promises that would exert undue influence on
voters. But, the Code is not enforceable in a court of law.

Still, the Election Commission can check fanciful promises that may misguide the voters. In
August 2016, it censured the AIADMK for not being able to give a rationale and show the means
to raise the finances required to carry out poll promises in the party manifesto like waiver of all
farm loans due to cooperative banks, free distribution of washing machines, steam boiler, and
idli cookers, gift coupons for all ration card holders, etc. The EC also asked the DMK to be more
circumspect and adhere to the Model Code of Conduct.

A PIL seeking judicial action for ensuring compliance with manifestos was rejected. Writ of
Mandamus is “wholly misconceived” to enforce manifestos, according to a verdict of Punjab and
Haryana High Court.
Pre-poll alliances have become common, but not common manifestos of constituent members.
Recently, JD(S) leader suggested a common manifesto for the mahagathbandhan against the

BJP, but it did not find takers. Some regional parties stick to their poll promises regardless of
their post-poll alliance.

In 1998, the Left Parties comprising the CPM, CPI, Revolutionary Socialist Party, and All India
Forward Bloc issued a joint left manifesto expressing their commitment to a strong secular-
democratic system, a just social order for all oppressed sections, growth with equity, and
corruption-free and accountable government. The United Front issued a “Common Programme
and Joint Policy Declaration”.

In 2015, for the Bihar Assembly election, the mahagathbandhan of RJD, JD (U), and Congress
issued a common manifesto which was almost copy of the 7-point agenda of the JD(U) for
welfare and development of the State.

In our neighbourhood, the Awami League of Bangladesh, a 14-party alliance, brought a common
manifesto in 2008 and in 2018.

Manifestos, like party flags and election symbols, have symbolic value. AAP and BJP exchanged
symbolic gestures of burning each other’s manifesto — the former for non-implementation of
statehood for Delhi, and the latter for “tower of failures” of AAP government.

However, voters do not take manifestos seriously since performance and promises of parties are
not linked fully. Parties which supported GST and Women’s Reservation in their manifestos,
became strong critics of GST and blocked women’s reservation bill in Parliament.
Ensuring compliance with manifesto promises is a key reform needed in the electoral system to
eradicate the menace of empty promises and promote accountability of parties.

(The writer is a former Director, ICSSR, New Delhi)–INFA

PM Modi slams Rahul for his ‘drunkard youth remark’

Varanasi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday launched a scathing attack on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for saying that the youth in Varanasi have turned drunkards. Addressing a public meeting...

Former LS Speaker, ex-Maha CM Manohar Joshi ‘Sir’ passes away

Mumbai: Former Lok Sabha Speaker and ex-Maharashtra Chief Minister Manohar G. Joshi, a senior Shiv Sena (UBT) leader, passed away following a heart attack early on Friday morning. “Our family...

You will see even more progress in next five years: PM Modi in Varanasi

Varanasi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on Friday, said that Kashi was an ancient city -- older than time -- and its identity was being nurtured and nourished by the young...

Jolt to YSRCP as Rajya Sabha MP Prabhakar Reddy quits

Amaravati: In a jolt to YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) ahead of elections, MP Vemireddy Prabhakar Reddy on Wednesday resigned from the party and also from Rajya Sabha. In a letter...

Days of exploitation & dynastic rule over in J&K: PM Modi

Jammu: Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Tuesday that J&K has got freedom from a long dynastic rule that focused on their own progress and development and not that of...

Swami Prasad Maurya resigns from Samajwadi Party, also quits as MLC

Lucknow: Senior Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Swami Prasad Maurya, on Tuesday, resigned from the primary membership of the party and also from the membership of the UP Vidhan Parishad. In...

Previous govts involved in some of the biggest scams: Union Minister

Mumbai: Previous governments inadequately regulated critical sectors such as telecom, amid massive scams, but our approach in creating a framework of regulation has been open and transparent, Union Minister of...

Samajwadi Party facing revolt in the ranks

Lucknow: Swami Prasad Maurya, Pallavi Patel, Kamal Kumar Gautam, Brajesh Prajapati and now Salim Shervani -- the Samajwadi Party in Uttar Pradesh is facing a full-blown revolt in its ranks....

Will join Rahul’s yatra only if seat-sharing finalised, says Akhilesh

Lucknow: Samajwadi Party President Akhilesh Yadav has said that he will not join Rahul Gandhi’s Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra in Uttar Pradesh unless seat-sharing between the SP and Congress is...

Raj Thackeray meets BJP city chief, sparks speculation of tie-up

Mumbai: Sparking fresh speculation of a tie-up, the Mumbai Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President Ashish Shelar called on Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray at the latter’s residence here...

Kiren Rijiju counters Rahul’s OBC barb on secretaries in govt

New Delhi: Union Minister Kiren Rijiju on Monday strongly countered Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s allegations of ‘discrimination’ against the Other Backward Class (OBC) community in the country’s top bureaucratic set-up....

Swami Prasad Maurya lashes out at Akhilesh, may form his own party

Lucknow: Senior Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Swami Prasad Maurya has lashed out at SP president Akhilesh Yadav, saying he will return whatever the latter had given him. Amid speculation about...

Read Previous

India Navy respond quickly to help Mozambique in cyclone IDAI rescue, relief operation

Read Next

9 sentenced to life in Dinakaran arson attack case

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com