Collegium not a search committee, no discretion in reiterated recommendations: SC to Centre

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday told the Centre that the “Collegium is not a search committee” and there cannot be any discretion in accepting its reiterated recommendations.

“The Collegium is not a search committee. It has a certain status in the constitutional fabric. This is not a case of a search committee, where it makes a recommendation and there is an absolute discretion whether to accept or not,” a bench headed by CJI DY Chandrachud told Attorney General (AG) R Venkataramani, the highest law officer of the Centre.

The Bench, also comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, asked AG Venkataramani to file a chart indicating the status of reiterated recommendations and the difficulty in notifying those names.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan said that a large number of reiterated recommendations are pending with the Centre and should be notified immediately. Bhushan added that apart from the above issue, the Centre “sits for years” on initial recommendations forwarded by the Collegium.

“Mr Attorney General, please tell us which are the reiterated names but remain pending and why are they pending? Give us a tabulated chart, and we will deal with it,” the apex court said.

Adjourning the hearing for next week, the SC said, “Let’s wait for a little while. Some of these appointments are in the pipeline. We are expecting that appointments (of Chief Justices of several HCs) should come very shortly.”

“Ultimately, Mr Attorney General, the idea is not to unearth skeletons in the cupboard but to move forward. The business of governance must proceed,” added the CJI Chandrachud-led Bench.

On Thursday, the Centre urged the apex court to “push for another week” the hearing on a batch of pleas concerning the delay in the appointment or transfer of judges in the higher judiciary.

“If the batch of petitions could be pushed for another week or so, I will be in a position to come back with something. Let it not be taken up tomorrow,” submitted A.G. Venkataramani.

At this, CJI Chandrachud said, “It will be on board because the causelist is already out. You can mention it tomorrow because the other side is not here.”

Presently, the committee comprising the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court, commonly called the Collegium, sends the recommendation for the appointment of a judge to the apex court as per the 1993 Second Judges Case.

The Collegium basically decides who will be appointed as a judge to the Supreme Court or a High Court. As per convention, the government is obliged to accept the Collegium’s recommendation if the decision has been reiterated. Commonly called “judges selecting judges”, in this system, judges are appointed and transferred only by judges.

In 2015, a five-judge Constitution Bench struck down the Centre’s idea of the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) to replace the Collegium system.

Article 124(2) of the Constitution provides that “every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary for the purpose.”

IANS

 

SC issues norms on demolitions, says violation will result in prosecution

New Delhi: Laying down pan-India directives governing demolitions of unauthorised structures, the Supreme Court on Wednesday cautioned that flouting its directions by state officials will result in criminal contempt and...

Disproportionate Assets: Lokayukta raids on govt officers across K’taka

Bengaluru: Karnataka Lokayukta sleuths are conducting multiple raids across the state on residences and offices of government officers. The raids are underway in Bidar, Belagavi, Dharwad, Mysuru, Davanagere districts. Sources...

Justice Sanjiv Khanna sworn in as 51st Chief Justice of India

New Delhi: President Droupadi Murmu on Monday administered the oath of office to Justice Sanjiv Khanna as the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in a swearing-in ceremony held at the...

Sale deed cannot certify the agricultural nature of the land: Delhi HC

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has said that a sale deed cannot certify the agricultural nature of the land since it is not a document issued by the revenue...

‘Want to tell you the raw data’: CJI Chandrachud on ‘hiking pendency’ in SC

New Delhi: Outgoing Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud on Friday responded to the allegations that the pendency of cases in the apex court has gone up during his...

Trolls will be unemployed after my retirement, quips CJI Chandrachud

New Delhi: Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud, who is set to retire in two days, on Friday said that he is probably one of the most trolled judges...

Important day for Muslims, says Owaisi on SC ruling on AMU

Hyderabad: All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) President Asaduddin Owaisi has hailed the Supreme Court order on the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University saying it is an important day for...

SC overrules its 1967 verdict denying minority status to AMU

New Delhi:   A 7-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Friday overrruled  its 1967 judgment in S. Azeez Basha vs. Union Of India according to which  Aligarh Muslim University...

MUDA case: CM Siddaramaiah appears before Lokayukta for questioning

Mysuru (Karnataka): Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah appeared before the Mysuru Lokayukta Superintendent T.J. Udesh on Wednesday morning in connection with the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) case. CM Siddaramaiah is...

LMV licence holders can drive light transport vehicles, reiterates SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday reiterated that Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) licence holders do not require any separate endorsement to drive a transport vehicle of the LMV class....

First part of unamended Article 31C remains in force, rules SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Article 31C of the Constitution, to the extent it was upheld in the landmark Keshavanada Bharati case, remains in force. A...

‘Entire statute doesn’t need to be struck down’: SC upholds UP Madarsa Act’s validity

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday set aside the Allahabad High Court ruling striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, holding that the law is...

Read Previous

‘Politics is filled with poison today’: Priyanka Gandhi slams response to Kharge’s letter to PM Modi

Read Next

Rocket barrage fired from Lebanon at Israel, Golan Heights, prompting shelter warnings

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com