Additional restrictions can’t be imposed on freedom of speech of lawmakers: SC

New Delhi:The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that no additional restrictions other than those prescribed under Article 19(2) of the Constitution can be imposed on the right to free speech of a citizen, and emphasized that restrictions under Article 19(2) are exhaustive.

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice S.A. Nazeer and comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian, and B.V. Nagarathna, delivered the verdict. However, Justice Nagarathna delivered a separate judgment.

Justice Ramasubramanian, reading the majority judgment, said no additional restrictions against free speech can be imposed except those mentioned under the Article 19(2) of the Constitution.

“The grounds…in Article 19(2) for restricting the right to free speech are exhaustive… additional restrictions not found in Article 19 (2) cannot be imposed on the exercise of the right conferred by Article 19 (1) (a)”, said Justice Ramasubramanian.

The top court said a minister’s statement can’t be vicariously attributed to the government and the minister is liable for the statement himself.

The constitution bench judgement delivered the verdict on whether restrictions can be imposed on the right to freedom of speech and expression of a public functionary.

Justice Nagarathna said hate speech strikes at the root of equality and fraternity and added that fundamental duties could be used to check disparaging speeches and promote harmony among citizens.

Justice Nagarathna said the court cannot impose any greater/ additional restrictions on the fundamental right of free speech of such public functionaries.

The detailed judgment in the matter will be uploaded later in the day.

The case originated from a statement made by Azam Khan, then Uttar Pradesh minister, about gang-rape case victims. The top court was hearing a plea filed by a man whose wife and daughter were allegedly gang-raped in July 2016 on a highway near Bulandshahr seeking transfer of the case to Delhi. The plea also sought lodging of a case against Khan in connection with his controversial statement that the gang-rape case was a “political conspiracy”.

In October 2017, a three-judge bench referred the matter to the constitution bench to decide various issues, which included whether a public functionary or a minister can claim freedom of speech while expressing views on sensitive matters.IANS

The journey of Supreme Court and India’s fundamental rights has been a constant struggle: SG Tushar Mehta

Sonipat: “The journey of fundamental rights has been a constant struggle, a constant fight, a constant conflict between the majoritarian government and the Supreme Court of India," said Tushar Mehta,...

Delhi HC dismisses Cong pleas against income tax re-assessment

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday turned down the pleas of Congress challenging the initiation of income tax re-assessment proceedings for the fiscal years 2017-18 to 2020-21. The...

Delhi HC admits CBI’s appeal against acquittal of A Raja, others in 2G spectrum case

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Friday admitted the appeal moved by the CBI challenging the 2017 trial court order acquitting key accused, including former Telecom Minister A. Raja...

Kejriwal kingpin of alleged excise policy scam, non-cooperative in investigation: ED

New Delhi: Arrested Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal is the kingpin of the alleged excise policy scam and is directly involved in its implementation and giving favours to the 'South...

ED raids residence of Bengal Minister Chandranath Sinha

Kolkata: A team of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) sleuths on Friday was at the residence of West Bengal Minister of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises and Textiles Department Chandranath Sinha...

Kejriwal withdraws petition from SC against ED arrest

New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who has been taken into custody by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the liquor policy case, withdrew his plea filed before the Supreme...

We’re going to take serious view: SC rebukes TN Guv for refusing to administer oath to Ponmudi as minister

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday took strong exception to Tamil Nadu Governor’s refusal to administer the oath to K Ponmudi as a minister in the state Cabinet. “What...

SC stays Centre’s notification establishing Fact Checking Unit (FCU) to address fake news

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed a notification issued by the Centre establishing Fact Checking Unit (FCU) under the Press Information Bureau (PIB) to prevent fake, false or...

ED files charge sheet against Karti Chidambaram, others in Chinese visa scam case

New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed a charge sheet before the Special PMLA Court in Delhi against Karti P. Chidambaram and his former Chartered Accountant S. Bhaskararaman in...

SBI files fresh compliance affidavit in SC disclosing all details of Electoral Bonds

New Delhi: In a latest affidavit filed on Wednesday, the State Bank of India (SBI) told the Supreme Court that it has disclosed all the details of the Electoral Bonds...

CM Kejriwal likely to skip ED’s 9th summons, moves Delhi HC for protection

New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal is likely to skip Enforcement Directorate’s ninth summons issued in connection with the now-scrapped excise policy case, said the AAP sources. This decision...

Delhi HC summons Mahua Moitra in defamation suit by former partner Jai Anant Dehadrai

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has issued summons to Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra in a defamation suit filed by lawyer and former partner Jai Anant Dehadrai. Earlier this...

Read Previous

27 Indians abroad to receive Pravasi Bharatiya Samman

Read Next

SC to hear on Jan 6 pleas seeking recognition of same-sex marriage

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com