‘Can’t declare minorities at district level’, SC on plea seeking minority status for Hindus

 

New Delhi, Aug 8: The Supreme Court on Monday reiterated that religious and linguistic minority status has to be decided state-wise, and orally observed that it is difficult to entertain a prayer to identify religious and linguistic minorities at the district level.

 

A bench headed by justice U.U. Lalit expressed its reservation to entertain a plea seeking to declare Hindus as minority in states where they are out-numbered by other communities.

 

The bench, also comprising justice S Ravindra Bhat, pointed out to a counsel representing the petitioner that previously it had asked senior advocate Arvind Datar, who was appearing for the petitioner then, to produce concrete examples where Hindus are being denied the benefits of minority status in states where they are numerically less.

 

Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay, who filed another similar petition in the matter, submitted before the bench that Hindus are minorities in some states. The bench replied, “Theoretically you’re right, but if the Supreme Court has said it had to be state-wise, why should we interfere?”

 

It may be noted that in the case of TMA Pai and others vs State of Karnataka (2002), the Supreme Court had held that minorities must be identified at the state-level.

 

Upadhyay had also filed a petition challenging the provisions of National Commission for Minorities Act 1992 and National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act 2004 and sought minority status for Hindus in certain states/UTs.

 

The bench noted that when it is talking about minorities, there are all India minorities, for example, there are Parsis and Konkani speaking people and there are people who are minorities in a small place. It further queried the counsel, “so how do you declare? It is not the job of the court to declare”.

 

The bench told the counsel that it is generally saying that Hindus must be declared as minority, which the court cannot declare due to absence of statistics for every particular state and every particular religion.

 

The top court reiterated its query and asked the counsel to give concrete examples of cases where Hindus are denied the protection of Article 30 in states where they are in a minority.

 

After hearing the arguments, the bench scheduled the hearing in the first week of September.

 

The top court was hearing a plea filed by Devkinandan Thakur, challenging a provision of the National Commission for Minorities (NCM) Act and seeking a direction to the Centre to define “minority” and lay down the guidelines for the identification of minorities at the district level.

 

The plea said: “Cause of action continues till date because followers of Judaism, Bahaism, and Hinduism; who are real minorities in Ladakh, Mizoram, Lakshadweep, Kashmir, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Punjab, Manipur, cannot establish and administer educational institutions of their choice because of non-identification of �minority’ at the state level, thus jeopardising their basic rights guaranteed under Article 29-30″.

 

The plea contended that their right under Articles 29-30 is being siphoned off illegally to the majority community in the state because the Centre has not notified them as �minority’ under the NCM Act.

 

The plea challenged the Section 2(C) of the Act, which declared Muslims, Christians, Buddhists, Parsis, Sikhs and Jains as minorities at the national level and sought direction for district-wise identification of minorities and state-wise status.

 

In May this year, the Ministry of Minority Affairs had told the Supreme Court that though the power is vested with the Centre to notify minorities, there should be a wider consultation with states and other stakeholders in view of the plea seeking a direction to the Centre to lay down guidelines for identification of minority at the state level, stating the Hindus are in minority in 10 states.

–IANS

SC asks if TN Governor could simply sit over Bills passed by Assembly

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Attorney General, the top-most law officer of the Centre, if the Tamil Nadu Governor could simply sit over the Bills passed...

Gujarat govt withdraws sedition cases against Patidar leaders

Ahmedabad: The Gujarat government has withdrawn sedition and other serious cases filed against Patidar movement leaders, including Hardik Patel, Dilip Sabva, Alpesh Kathiriya, and Lalji Patel. The decision, announced by...

K’taka HC refuses to entertain Yediyurappa’s plea to quash POCSO case; gives temporary relief

Bengaluru: In a setback to former Karnataka Chief Minister and BJP Central Parliamentary Committee member B.S. Yediyurappa, the Karnataka High Court has refused to quash charges against him under a...

‘Raise this before Parliament’: SC refuses to entertain PIL challenging laws ‘targeting men’

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking direction to declare unconstitutional laws primarily "targeting men" and "unfairly presuming men as aggressors in domestic...

Rajasthan introduces new Bill in Assembly to curb unlawful religious conversions

Jaipur: The Bhajan Lal Sharma-led Bharatiya Janata Party government tabled the Rajasthan Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Bill, 2025, in the ongoing Budget Session of the Assembly on Monday....

Waqf Bill: All complaints, amendments have been included, says Pal; dismisses Oppn claims

New Delhi: Jagdambika Pal, the Chairman of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, responded to the Opposition's concerns on Monday regarding the committee's meetings and...

Maha Kumbh stampede: PIL in SC seeks action against officials

New Delhi: Following the tragic stampede at the Maha Kumbh in which at least 30 people were killed and around 60 others injured, a public interest litigation (PIL) has been...

Honour killing case: Karnataka court sentences woman’s brothers, uncles to death

Gadag (Karnataka):The Gadag District and Sessions Court in Karnataka sentenced four men to the death penalty on Thursday after finding them guilty in an honour killing case. The men had...

‘Impermissible’: SC rules out residence-based reservation in PG medical courses

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that residence-based reservation in Post Graduate (PG) medical courses under state quota is constitutionally invalid. A bench, headed by Justice Hrishikesh Roy,...

Case against Kejriwal under Disaster Management Act, says Haryana Minister

Chandigarh: Haryana Revenue and Disaster Management Minister Vipul Goel said on Wednesday that the state government has taken strong cognisance of the statement by former Delhi Chief Minister and Aam...

RG Kar protest: SC passes protection order for doctors who returned to work after August 22 last year

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed hospitals and medical colleges across the country to not penalise doctors and medical professionals, who participated in protests against the rape and...

SC asks Centre to give data on cases registered against Muslim men for pronouncing triple talaq

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday told the Centre to furnish data on criminal cases registered under the 2019 Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, which criminalises...

Read Previous

Israel and Palestine reach fragile truce

Read Next

Man arrested from Batla House for alleged IS links sent to NIA custody till Aug 16

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com