SC agrees to form constitution bench to hear pleas against polygamy, ‘nikah-halala’

Supreme Court.

 

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to reconstitute a constitution bench to hear a clutch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the practice of polygamy and ‘nikah-halala’ among Muslims.

On August 30, a five-judge constitution bench comprising justices Indira Banerjee, Hemant Gupta, Surya Kant, M.M. Sundresh, and Sudhanshu Dhulia had issued notice on the petitions. However, two judges — justice Banerjee and justice Gupta — have retired now.

On Thursday, one of the petitioners, advocate Ashwini Upadhyay, mentioned the matter before a bench headed by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising justices Hima Kohli and J.B. Pardiwala, which said it will form a new bench.

A total of nine petitions have been filed challenging the constitutional validity of the practice of polygamy and ‘nikah-halala’.

Polygamy allows a Muslim man to have four wives, and once a Muslim woman has been divorced, her husband is not permitted to take her back even if he had pronounced talaq under the influence of any intoxicant, unless his wife undergoes nikah-halala, which involves her marriage with another man, who subsequently divorces her so that her previous husband can re-marry her.

The petitions have been filed by Muslim women and advocate Ashwini Upadhyay challenging the constitutional validity of polygamy and nikah halala. These cases were referred to the five-judge bench by a three-judge bench in March 2018.

In August, the apex court had issued notice to the Centre, National Commission for Women, National Commission for Minorities, Law Commission etc., and scheduled the matter for hearing after Dussehra holidays.

Upadhyay’s plea said the injury caused to women as a reult of the practice of triple talaq, polygamy and nikah halala is violative of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution and injurious to public order, morality and health.

The plea sought a direction to declare Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution, insofar as it seeks to recognise polygamy and nikah-halala.

“It is well settled that common law has primacy over personal law. Hence, this court may declare that triple talaq is cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC, nikah-halala is rape under Section 375 of the IPC, and polygamy is an offence under Section 494 of the IPC,” Upadhyay’s plea read.

In August 2017, the top court had held that the practice of triple talaq is unconstitutional and struck it down by 3:2 majority.

In its 2017 verdict, the apex court had kept open the issue of polygamy and nikah-halala, while quashing the practice of triple talaq.

“It is submitted that religious leaders and priests like imams, maulvis etc., who propagate, support and authorise practices like talaq-e-bidat, nikah-halala and polygamy are grossly misusing their position, influence and power to subject Muslim women to such gross practices which treat them as chattel, thereby violating their basic rights enshrined under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution,” Upadhyay’s plea read. IANS

 

Dhankar raises issue of SC scrapping NJAC Act in maiden speech as RS Chairman

New Delhi: Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankar on Wednesday raised the issue of the Supreme Court striking down the NJAC act during his maiden speech in the House. "A glaring instance...

Muslim personal law board to move SC against acquittal of 32 accused in Babri Masjid demolition case

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Wednesday said it will move the Supreme Court against a CBI special court acquittal of all the 32 accused in the...

‘If he was an Indian, he would have been granted bail’, SC on Michel’s bail pleas

New Delhi, Dec 6 (IANS) The Supreme Court on Tuesday questioned the Centre that for how long will it keep Christian Michel, who is a foreign national, behind the bars, and...

Delhi HC defers petitions seeking recognition of same-sex marriages

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday deferred petitions seeking recognition of same-sex marriages under the Hindu Marriage Act and the Special Marriage Act. The batch of petitions will be...

‘India is a secular country’, SC junks plea to declare Thakur Anukulchandra as ‘Pramatma’

India is a secular country and everybody has a right to their religion, the Supreme Court said on Monday while dismissing a PIL seeking to declare late religious figure Sri...

SC says ‘forced’ religious conversion serious issue, asks Centre to file affidavit

The plea by BJP leader and advocate Ashwini Upadhyay seeks stringent steps to tackle forceful religious conversions Critics are of the view that the stringent anti-conversion law is against the...

‘Purpose of charity must not be conversion’, SC on plea against forced conversion

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday reiterated that the issue of forced religious conversion is a "very serious issue" and emphasized that charity is welcome, but the purpose of charity...

Allahabad HC wants to know why not ban caste rallies?

Prayagraj:  The Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court has issued fresh notices to the four major political parties of Uttar Pradesh seeking their response on why there should not be...

Hyderabad varsity prof jailed for sexually harassing foreign student

Hyderabad:  A professor of University of Hyderabad has been sent to jail on allegation of trying to sexually assault a foreign student. Ravi Ranjan, a professor in the Department of...

‘Nepotism does happen’: SCBA prez pinpoints flaws in judges’ appointment

New Delhi: Senior advocate and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Vikas Singh, in an interview with IANS on the appointment of judges, said he is not saying nepotism is institutionally...

If Centre gets complete control, judiciary won’t be free: Ex-SC judge Madan Lokur

New Delhi,:  Former Supreme Court judge Justice Madan B. Lokur, in an interview with IANS, said "the manner in which the executive has been dealing with the recommendations of the...

‘Nepotism does happen’: SCBA prez pinpoints flaws in judges’ appointment

New Delhi:  Senior advocate and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Vikas Singh, in an interview with IANS on the appointment of judges, said he is not saying nepotism is...

Read Previous

SC questions Centre on EC appointment. Key points  

Read Next

Vaccinated people now make majority of Covid deaths in US: Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com