Ramani’s allegations defamatory, mala fide: Akbar

May 4, 2019
New Delhi: In a heated exchange between lawyers of both parties, former Union Minister M.J. Akbar recorded his statement in a Delhi court on Saturday saying that the allegations levelled by journalist Priya Ramani against him were defamatory and mala fide.

The court was hearing the defamation case against Ramani filed by the former Minister of State for External Affairs, who is now with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Ramani was the first in a long list of female journalists to accuse Akbar, a journalist-turned-politician, of sexual harassment.

On Saturday, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Samar Vishal began examining Akbar’s statement in the case.

During Akbar’s examination by his counsel Geeta Luthra, the politician said that allegations levelled by Ramani were highly offensive, mala fide, false and fabricated.

“Ramani’s tweet had adversely affected my reputation,” Akbar told the court.

Meanwhile, the two-hour-long hearing witnessed several interruptions as Luthra raised objections on various questions asked by Ramani’s counsel Rebecca John while cross-examining Akbar.

However, the court allowed John to proceed, saying it was a criminal defamation case and “she has the liberty to defend herself”.

When advocate John asked Akbar whether he asked Ramani to meet him at The Oberoi hotel in Mumbai’s Nariman Point when she had gone for an interview at The Asian Age newspapers’s office there in December 1993, he replied that he could not recollect the incident.

Ramani’s counsel also asked Akbar questions related to his political connections and raised queries over his ideology, saying that he had changed it several times in the course of his political career.

Akbar won the elections from Bihar’s Kishanganj constituency in 1989 as a Congress candidate and lost the polls from the same seat in 1991.

In response, he said it was wrong to suggest that this behaviour reflects his “political opportunism”.

Advocate John also asked about the contempt notice issued against Akbar by the Delhi High Court in 2003 for reporting false report of court proceedings, to which he replied that he did not remember.

Akbar’s counsel said that John’s questions were irrelevant and raised objections against them.

As the examination of Akbar remained incomplete, the court listed the matter for the further hearing on May 20.


Women’s Reservation Bill gets President’s assent, becomes law

New Delhi: President Droupadi Murmu has given her assent to the Women's Reservation Bill, a week after it was passed by both Houses of Parliament, thus making it a law....

ISKCON sends Rs 100 cr defamation notice to BJP MP Maneka Gandhi

New Delhi: Days after BJP MP and former Union Minister Maneka Gandhi stirred a major controversy with her remarks that the International Society for Krishna Consciousness (ISKCON) is the "biggest...

SC grants bail to 75-yr-old man convicted after 40 years in murder & rape case

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has come to the rescue of a 75-year-old man who was convicted after 40 years in a 1983 murder and rape case. In its recent...

Allahabad HC asks UP govt to decide on sex change issue by Oct 18

Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court has expressed dissatisfaction over the Uttar Pradesh government not framing guidelines as per the 2014 Supreme Court judgment that recognised transgender individuals as the ‘third...

‘Senior bureaucrats not listening’: Delhi govt seeks urgent hearing against Services Act in SC

New Delhi: The Delhi government on Wednesday told the Supreme Court that senior bureaucrats were not carrying out orders of the elected government while urging for an urgent hearing on...

26/11 case: Mumbai court to take up fresh charge sheet against terror accused Rana

Mumbai: Five months after a US court ordered the extradition of Pakistani-Canadian businessman Tahawwur Hussain Rana to India for his connections in the Mumbai 26/11 terror attacks, the city police...

Student slap case: ‘Incident should shock the conscience of state’, observes SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday orally remarked that the incident in Uttar Pradesh's Muzaffarnagar should "shock the conscience of the state” if the viral video of a school...

Judiciary, legal fraternity have been long protectors of India’s justice system: PM Modi

New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday said the legal fraternity plays a key role in the building of any country, adding that the judiciary and bar have long...

This is the original copy of Constitution: Meghwal on ‘secular, socialist’ words missing

New Delhi: Trashing the Opposition's allegations that the words "socialist, secular" are missing in the new copies of the Constitution, the Centre on Wednesday asserted that it was the copy...

Women Reservation Bill: Confusion regarding bill in tab; Shah seen explaining to Rajnath, Owaisi helps SP MP

New Delhi: As part of the proceedings on the first day in the new Parliament complex, the Narendra Modi government introduced the much awaited Women Reservation Bill. While Union Law...

Centre introduces ‘Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam’ in Lok Sabha

New Delhi: The Centre on Tuesday introduced in Lok Sabha the 'Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam 2023' or the Women Reservation Bill, which seeks to guarantee 33 per cent quota for...

SC refuses to urgently list plea seeking legal action against Stalin Jr over his controversial statements on ‘Sanatan Dharma’

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to pass any orders directing urgent listing of a plea seeking directions to Tamil Nadu government to register FIR against its minister...

Read Previous

Indian expat wins $4 million Abu Dhabi raffle

Read Next

Bua-babua’ partnership will end on May 23: Adityanath

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com