‘No error’: SC trashes review plea against electoral bonds verdict

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has dismissed a clutch of petitions seeking a review of the Constitution Bench verdict striking down the electoral bonds scheme 2018 as unconstitutional.

After perusal of the review petitions, a bench headed by Justice CJI DY Chandrachud said that “there is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013. The review petitions are, therefore, dismissed”.

In a unanimous verdict, a five-judge Constitution Bench had struck down the electoral bonds scheme, saying that denying voters the right to know the details of funding of political parties would lead to a dichotomous situation and the funding of political parties cannot be treated differently from that of the candidates who contest elections.

In its February 15 judgment, the Supreme Court had directed the State Bank of India (SBI) to forthwith stop the issuance of electoral bonds and ordered the Election Commission of India (ECI) to publish on its official website the details of the political parties which have received contributions through electoral bonds since April 2019.

CJI Chandrachud’s opinion, concurred by Justices B.R. Gavai, J.B. Padriwala and Manoj Misra, added that the infringement of the right to information of voters cannot be justified for the purpose of curbing black money in the electoral process.

Further, it said that the electoral bond scheme is “not the only means for curbing black money” in electoral financing and there are other alternatives which substantially fulfil the purpose and impact the right to information minimally when compared to the impact of electoral bonds on the right to information.

Justice Sanjiv Khanna authored a separate but concurring verdict. “I have also applied proportionality standards but with slightly different variations. My conclusions are the same,” Justice Khanna said.

One of the review petitions contended that the Supreme Court struck down the electoral bonds scheme “without noticing that in doing so it is acting as an appellate authority over the Parliament, substituting its wisdom on a matter which falls in the exclusive province of legislative and executive policy”.

However, the apex court dismissed the entire batch of review petitions in chambers, along with the application for listing the review pleas in open court.

In August this year, the top court declined to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking a Special Investigative Team (SIT) probe under the supervision of a retired apex court judge into an alleged scam in poll financing using electoral bonds.

A bench presided over by CJI Chandrachud said that an SIT cannot be formed to probe “quid pro quo” unless there is an FIR already registered on the issue espoused in the PIL, adding that the ordinary course of law may remedy the allegations raised in the plea.

The PIL filed by the NGO Common Cause and Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) had said that electoral bond data — revealed on top court’s directions — shows that the bulk of the bonds appeared to have been given as quid pro quo arrangements by corporates to political parties for getting contracts, licences, and leases from the governments or authorities.

Further, it alleged that electoral bonds were given by corporates to political parties as consideration for favourable policy changes and in close proximity to action by agencies like the Enforcement Directorate (ED), the Income Tax Department, or the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

IANS

 

Disproportionate Assets: Lokayukta raids on govt officers across K’taka

Bengaluru: Karnataka Lokayukta sleuths are conducting multiple raids across the state on residences and offices of government officers. The raids are underway in Bidar, Belagavi, Dharwad, Mysuru, Davanagere districts. Sources...

Justice Sanjiv Khanna sworn in as 51st Chief Justice of India

New Delhi: President Droupadi Murmu on Monday administered the oath of office to Justice Sanjiv Khanna as the Chief Justice of India (CJI) in a swearing-in ceremony held at the...

Sale deed cannot certify the agricultural nature of the land: Delhi HC

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has said that a sale deed cannot certify the agricultural nature of the land since it is not a document issued by the revenue...

‘Want to tell you the raw data’: CJI Chandrachud on ‘hiking pendency’ in SC

New Delhi: Outgoing Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud on Friday responded to the allegations that the pendency of cases in the apex court has gone up during his...

Trolls will be unemployed after my retirement, quips CJI Chandrachud

New Delhi: Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud, who is set to retire in two days, on Friday said that he is probably one of the most trolled judges...

Important day for Muslims, says Owaisi on SC ruling on AMU

Hyderabad: All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) President Asaduddin Owaisi has hailed the Supreme Court order on the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University saying it is an important day for...

SC overrules its 1967 verdict denying minority status to AMU

New Delhi:   A 7-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Friday overrruled  its 1967 judgment in S. Azeez Basha vs. Union Of India according to which  Aligarh Muslim University...

MUDA case: CM Siddaramaiah appears before Lokayukta for questioning

Mysuru (Karnataka): Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah appeared before the Mysuru Lokayukta Superintendent T.J. Udesh on Wednesday morning in connection with the Mysuru Urban Development Authority (MUDA) case. CM Siddaramaiah is...

LMV licence holders can drive light transport vehicles, reiterates SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday reiterated that Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) licence holders do not require any separate endorsement to drive a transport vehicle of the LMV class....

First part of unamended Article 31C remains in force, rules SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Article 31C of the Constitution, to the extent it was upheld in the landmark Keshavanada Bharati case, remains in force. A...

‘Entire statute doesn’t need to be struck down’: SC upholds UP Madarsa Act’s validity

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday set aside the Allahabad High Court ruling striking down the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, holding that the law is...

SC relaxes bail condition of journalist Siddique Kappan in UAPA case

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday allowed an application filed by Kerala journalist Siddique Kappan seeking relaxation of the bail condition requiring him to record his presence at the...

Read Previous

J&K Exit Polls: Cong-NC seen taking lead but missing the majority mark

Read Next

Haryana Exit Polls: Congress set for clean sweep with 50-60 seats, predict four pollsters

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com