‘It’s a menace’: Centre to SC on forced religious conversion

New Delhi: The Centre on Monday told the Supreme Court that the issue of forced religious conversion “is a menace”, and it is cognizant of the gravity and the seriousness of the issue.

A bench comprising justices M.R. Shah and C.T. Ravikumar, at the beginning of the hearing, said “this is a serious issue”. Citing Centre’s reply in the matter, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said, this “is a menace”.

Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, appearing on behalf of an intervenor, submitted that the petition is not maintainable and pointed out that the same petition was filed twice earlier and then withdrawn.

Petitioner advocate Ashwini Upadhyay opposed the plea for intervention saying that there will be a flood of applications if the present application is allowed.

The bench scheduled the matter for further hearing on December 5, as the matter came up for hearing when court was rising for the day.

The Ministry of Home Affairs, in an affidavit, said it is cognizant of the gravity and the seriousness of the issue raised in the present writ petition and enactments are necessary for protecting cherished rights of vulnerable sections of the society including women and economically and socially backward classes.

“It is submitted that that public order is a state subject and in pursuance to the same various states over the course of the years passed enactments seeking to curb the practices highlighted in the present petition.”

The Centre said nine state governments have already have legislations in place on the present subject — Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, and Haryana.

It said that the reliefs sought in the present petition would be taken up in all seriousness by it and appropriate steps shall be taken as it is cognizant of the menace.

The Centre’s response came on a plea by Upadhyay against fraudulent religious conversion and religious conversion by intimidation, threatening, deceivingly luring through gifts and monetary benefits, as it offends Articles 14, 21, and 25.

The plea claimed that if such conversions were not checked, Hindus would soon become a minority in India.

In the affidavit, the Union Ministry of Home Affairs said: “It is submitted that the right to freedom of religion does not include a fundamental right to convert other people to a particular religion. The said right certainly does not include the right to convert an individual through fraud, deception, coercion, allurement or other such means.”

The Central government said the petitioner has highlighted a large number of instances carried out in an organised, systematic and sophisticated manner of conversion of vulnerable citizens in the country through fraud, deception, coercion, allurement or other such means.

It further added that the meaning and purport of the word ‘propagate’ falling under Article 25 of the Constitution was discussed and debated in great detail in the constituent assembly and the inclusion of the said word was passed by the constituent assembly only after the clarification that the fundamental right under Article 25 would not include the right to convert.

The Centre said the apex court has held that the word ‘propagate’ does not envisage the right to convert a person rather is in the nature of the positive right to spread once religion by exposition of its tenets.

“This Court further held that fraudulent or induced conversion impinges upon the right to freedom of conscience of an individual apart from hampering public order and, therefore, the state was well within its power to regulate/ restrict the same,” it added.

On November 14, the Supreme Court said forced religious conversion is a “very serious issue”, and may affect the security of the nation and asked the Centre to make its stand clear on what steps can be taken to curb forced conversions.

The top court said there is freedom of religion, but no freedom on forced conversion.

The Supreme Court asked the Centre to get information from all the states regarding the steps taken by them in connection with forced conversions. – IANS

Tripura tribal party to adopt resolution against CAA within 150 days after ‘coming to power’

Agartala : Tipra Motha Party (TMP), which has been demanding to upgrade the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council (TTAADC) as a full-fledged state, would pass a resolution against the...

Centre notifies appointment of 5 new judges to Supreme Court

New Delhi: Amid the long-drawn tussle between the Centre and the judiciary over appointment of judges, the Centre on Saturday cleared the names of five judges for appointment to the Supreme...

‘Amended UAPA is menace to democracy’: Shashi Tharoor on journalist’s release

‘Siddique Kappan release after 28 months in jail reminds us that UAPA allows the government to detain people indefinitely without charge’ The Kerala journalist asked for reading material in jail...

‘Criminal conspiracy’: Lawyer moves SC seeking a probe into Hindenburg report

' New Delhi: A PIL has been moved in the Supreme Court seeking a direction to the Centre and the SEBI to inquire into alleged "criminal conspiracy" behind the Hindenburg...

J’khand HC grants relief to Rahul Gandhi in case pertaining to remarks against Amit Shah

Ranchi: The Jharkhand High Court has granted relief to former Congress president Rahul Gandhi in a case related to his remarks against former BJP president Amit Shah. The court has...

Don’t make us take a hard stand’, SC warns Centre on delaying judges’ transfer

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday warned the Centre on the delay in clearing the transfer of high court judges recommended by the apex court collegium, saying it may...

SC agrees to hear plea seeking prohibition of hate speech

The Supreme Court has expressed concern over hate speech and agreed to hear a plea seeking to prohibit Hindu Janakrosh Morcha event scheduled be held on February 5 in Mumbai....

Hindu Sena files PIL in SC seeking ban on BBC’s operation in India

A far right group has filed a PIL in the Supreme Court seeking imposition of complete ban on the BBC from operating in the country as well as a probe...

If accused is dead, fine can be collected from successors: K’taka HC

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court in an important judgment stated that the fine can be collected from the property or from the successors who inherit from the accused even after...

SC seeks info on inadequate SC, ST representation in promotions

The Supreme Court has sought information from all states on the yardstick being adopted to identify the inadequate representation of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) in reservation for...

SC Collegium recommends two more names for appointment as judges

The two names are: Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal and Gujarat High Court Chief Justice Aravind Kumar. The resolution said that the judicial appointment body took into consideration...

Gujarat HC sets up panel to probe denial of medical care to pregnant women

Ahmedabad,: A division bench of the Gujarat High Court has set up a committee to be headed by retired justice to look into two incidents where pregnant women were allegedly...

Read Previous

Surge in porn, spam tweets as China Covid protests swell

Read Next

Sexual assault case: SC refuses to entertain Tarun Tejpal plea for in-camera hearing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com