‘Ulterior design’: SC junks Zakia Jafri’s plea against clean chit to Modi in 2002 riots 

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed the appeal filed by Zakia Jafri, wife of Congress leader Ehsan Jafri who was killed during the violence at Ahmedabad’s Gulberg Society in 2002, challenging the SIT’s clean chit to then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and others during the riots in the state.

A bench, headed by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar said that intriguingly, the present proceedings have been pursued for last 16 years (from submission of complaint dated June 8, 2006 running into 67 pages and then by filing 514-page protest petition dated April 15, 2013) including with the audacity to question the integrity of every functionary involved in the process of exposing the devious stratagem adopted.

“To keep the pot boiling, obviously, for ulterior design. As a matter of fact, all those involved in such abuse of process, need to be in the dock and proceeded with in accordance with law,” said the bench, which also comprised Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and C.T. Ravikumar, in the 307-page judgement, besides 144-page annexure.

In 2006, Jafri filed a complaint seeking a probe into 30 points, which, she said, established the larger conspiracy related to the 2002 Gujarat riots, which left over 1,000 people dead. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal represented Jafri in the top court.

The bench said the court-appointed SIT in 2012, had formed its opinion after considering all the materials collated during the investigation and discarded larger criminal conspiracy allegations at the highest level for precipitating mass violence against the minority community in the state.

“Hence, the final report, as submitted by the SIT, ought to be accepted as it is, without doing anything more,” said the bench, adding that it does not countenance appellant’s submission regarding infraction of rule of law in the matter of investigation.

The top court said the SIT’s final report was backed by firm logic, expositing analytical mind, and dealing with all aspects objectively for discarding the allegations regarding larger criminal conspiracy. “The materials collected do not give rise to strong or grave suspicion regarding hatching of larger criminal conspiracy,” it noted.

It said it found force in the argument of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Gujarat government, that the testimony of then senior IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt, former Home Minister Haren Pandya, and senior IPS officer R.B. Sreekumar was only to sensationalise and politicise the matters in issue, although, replete with falsehood.

“For, persons not privy to the stated meeting, where utterances were allegedly made by the then Chief Minister, falsely claimed themselves to be eye-witnesses and after thorough investigation by the SIT, it has become clear that their claim of being present in the meeting was itself false to their knowledge. On such false claims, the structure of larger criminal conspiracy at the highest level has been erected. The same stands collapsed like a house of cards, aftermath thorough investigation by the SIT,” it noted.

The top court appreciated the indefatigable work done by the team of SIT officials in the challenging circumstances they had to face. “At the end of the day, it appears to us that a coalesced effort of the disgruntled officials of the state of Gujarat, along with others, was to create sensation by making revelations which were false to their own knowledge. The falsity of their claims had been fully exposed by the SIT after a thorough investigation,” it said.

On December 12, 2013, the Ahmedabad’s magistrate court had accepted the SIT’s report and rejected a protest petition filed by Jafri on April 15, 2013. On October 5, the high court junked her criminal revision petition.

The top court said there is no material worth the name to even create a suspicion, indicative of the meeting of the minds of all concerned at some level; and in particular, the bureaucrats, politicians, public prosecutors, VHP, RSS, Bajrang Dal or the members of the state political establishment – for hatching a larger criminal conspiracy at the highest level to cause and precipitate mass violence against the minority community across the state during the relevant period. “Such conclusion reached by the Magistrate and the High Court is unexceptionable,” it said.

The top court said the SIT exposed the falsity of claims made by Bhatt and Pandya and also collated materials indicative of the amount of hard work and planning of the concerned state functionaries in their attempt to control the spontaneous evolving situation of mass violence across Gujarat.

The top court concluded: “After cogitating over the matter, we uphold the decision of the Magistrate in accepting the stated final report dated February 8, 2012 submitted by the SIT, as it is and rejecting the protest petition filed by the appellant… we hold that this appeal is devoid of merits and resultantly, deserves to be dismissed…” – IANS

The journey of Supreme Court and India’s fundamental rights has been a constant struggle: SG Tushar Mehta

Sonipat: “The journey of fundamental rights has been a constant struggle, a constant fight, a constant conflict between the majoritarian government and the Supreme Court of India," said Tushar Mehta,...

Delhi HC dismisses Cong pleas against income tax re-assessment

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Thursday turned down the pleas of Congress challenging the initiation of income tax re-assessment proceedings for the fiscal years 2017-18 to 2020-21. The...

Delhi HC admits CBI’s appeal against acquittal of A Raja, others in 2G spectrum case

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Friday admitted the appeal moved by the CBI challenging the 2017 trial court order acquitting key accused, including former Telecom Minister A. Raja...

Kejriwal kingpin of alleged excise policy scam, non-cooperative in investigation: ED

New Delhi: Arrested Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal is the kingpin of the alleged excise policy scam and is directly involved in its implementation and giving favours to the 'South...

ED raids residence of Bengal Minister Chandranath Sinha

Kolkata: A team of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) sleuths on Friday was at the residence of West Bengal Minister of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises and Textiles Department Chandranath Sinha...

Kejriwal withdraws petition from SC against ED arrest

New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who has been taken into custody by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the liquor policy case, withdrew his plea filed before the Supreme...

We’re going to take serious view: SC rebukes TN Guv for refusing to administer oath to Ponmudi as minister

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday took strong exception to Tamil Nadu Governor’s refusal to administer the oath to K Ponmudi as a minister in the state Cabinet. “What...

SC stays Centre’s notification establishing Fact Checking Unit (FCU) to address fake news

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed a notification issued by the Centre establishing Fact Checking Unit (FCU) under the Press Information Bureau (PIB) to prevent fake, false or...

ED files charge sheet against Karti Chidambaram, others in Chinese visa scam case

New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed a charge sheet before the Special PMLA Court in Delhi against Karti P. Chidambaram and his former Chartered Accountant S. Bhaskararaman in...

SBI files fresh compliance affidavit in SC disclosing all details of Electoral Bonds

New Delhi: In a latest affidavit filed on Wednesday, the State Bank of India (SBI) told the Supreme Court that it has disclosed all the details of the Electoral Bonds...

CM Kejriwal likely to skip ED’s 9th summons, moves Delhi HC for protection

New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal is likely to skip Enforcement Directorate’s ninth summons issued in connection with the now-scrapped excise policy case, said the AAP sources. This decision...

Delhi HC summons Mahua Moitra in defamation suit by former partner Jai Anant Dehadrai

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has issued summons to Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra in a defamation suit filed by lawyer and former partner Jai Anant Dehadrai. Earlier this...

Read Previous

India warns of Afghanistan becoming haven for JeM, LeT; calls for int’l action

Read Next

Students in Bihar provoked through Whatsapp groups during Agnipath protest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com