Justice Muralidhar, who pulled up Delhi Police over riots, transferred; timing questioned

Justice Muralidhar (Photo: Courtesy Law Live)

By Naz Asghar

Feb 27, 2020

New Delhi: The Ministry of Law and Justice on Wednesday transferred Justice S. Muralidhar of the Delhi High Court to the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which has raised many eyebrows, as the order comes a day on which the judge had pulled up the Delhi authorities over handling of riots in the capital and for not registering FIR in the case of inflammatory speeches made by some BJP leaders.

Recently, the Supreme Court Collegium had recommended the transfer of Justice Muralidhar to the Punjab and Haryana High Court, but the timing of the action on recommendation is being questioned.

Since the gazette notification does not mention the date from which the transfer order would be effective, it is supposed that it comes into force with immediate effect.

Earlier on Wednesday, a high court bench headed by Justice Muralidhar passed a series of orders castigating the Delhi authorities over handling of the violence in North-East Delhi and said that “another 1984-like situation cannot be allowed to happen in the city under its watch.”

”We cant let another 1984 scenario happen in this city, not under the watch of this court, observed Justice Murlidhar making an appeal to the authorities of Delhi Governmet and the Centre to reach out to the victims.

later on Wednesday, a bench comprising Justice Murlidhar and justice Talwant directed the Delhi police to take decision within a day regarding registration of FIR for inflammatory speeches against politicians Athakur, Pravesh Verma, Abhay Verma and Kapil Mishra, who had allegedly incited the violence.

The hearing was on an urgent petition filed by social activists Harsh Mander and Farah Naqvi.

The judge had also ordered safe passage for the collection of the bodies of the deceased, setting up of adequate number of helplines and setting up shelter for people displaced duriung the violence.

At least 32 people have so far lost their lives while over 200 have been injured after clashes between pro and anti-CAA protesters turned violent in North-East Delhi.

The recommendation for transfer of Justice Muralidhar was also opposed by the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) and it had February 20 announced a strike against the move.

In a resolution, the DHCBA had expressed its “shock, dismay and outrage” at the decision to recommend the transfer of “one of the finest judges to have adorned the bench.”

The resolution stated, “Such transfers are not only detrimental to our noble institution, but also tend to erode and dislodge the faith of the common litigant in the justice dispensation system. Such transfers also impede free and fair delivery of justice by the honourable bench.”

The Congress has also questioned the Government motive. Congress general secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra tweeted: “The midnight transfer of Justice Muralidhar isn’t shocking given the current dispensation, but it is certianly sad & shameful.”

“Millions of Indians have faith in a resilient & upright judiciary, the government’s attempts to muzzle justice & break their faith are deplorable,” she said.

Rahul Gandhi also joined in by tweeting:” Remembering the brave Judge Loya, who wasn’t transferred.”

Judge B.H. Loya was presiding over the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case, when he died in December 2014 at Nagpur under mysterious circumstances.

Earlier, Congress leader Randeep Surjewala said, “BjP feared that the conspiracy of the riots will get exposed and this is the reason why the Justice Murlidhar has been transferred,” adding that the transfer is an attempt to save the BJP leaders against whom Murlidhar had made strong observations.

However, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has dismissed the criticism, saying that the transfer was done in pursuance of the order of the Supreme Court Collegium .

”Transfer of Hon’ble Justice Muralidhar was done pursuant to the recommendation dated 12.02.2020 of the Supreme Court collegium headed by Chief Justice of India. While transferring the judge consent of the judge is taken. The well settled process have been followed,” he tweeted.

”We respect independence of judiciary. Record of Congress in compromising independence of judiciary, superseding judges even of Supreme Court during Emergency is well known.They rejoice only when the judgment is of their liking otherwise raise questions on the institutions itself,’ the law Minister said.

Justice Muralidhar was also on the Delhi High Court Bench that first legalised homosexuality in 2009 in a case filed by Naz Foundation. He also led the division bench that convicted Uttar Pradesh PAC in the Hashimpura massacre case and Congress leader Sajjan Kumar in 1984 anti-sikh riots..

He has been on the full bench that in 2010 that ruled in favour of disclosing how many SC judges had declared their assets.

Justice Muralidhar had been appointed judge of Delhi High Court in 2006.

–India News Stream

Nirav Modi refused bail fourth time by UK HC due to quantum of scam: ED

New Delhi: In a blow to Nirav Modi, the UK High Court has refused the fourth bail application of the alleged mastermind of $1 billion fraud against Punjab National Bank,...

ISKCON temple in Bengaluru does not belong to ISKCON Society Mumbai: SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that the ISKCON temple in Bengaluru does not belong to ISKCON Society Mumbai but to ISKCON Society Bangalore, registered under the Karnataka...

SC slams MP Minister Vijay Shah for remarks against Col Sofiya Qureshi

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday slammed Madhya Pradesh Tribal Affairs Minister Vijay Shah over his controversial remarks on Army officer Colonel Sofiya Qureshi. "What sort of statement are...

MP HC rebukes authorities on ‘poorly-drafted’ FIR against Minister Shah

Bhopal: The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Thursday sharply rebuked state authorities on the "poorly-drafted" FIR filed against Tribal Affairs Minister Vijay Shah and said that it will monitor the...

As Vijay Shah moves SC against MP HC order, Vivek Tankha questions BJP’s legal support

Bhopal: After BJP leader and Madhya Pradesh Minister Vijay Shah on Thursday approached the Supreme Court challenging a High Court order that initiated suo motu proceedings against him for his...

CJI Gavai-led Bench to hear tomorrow pleas against Waqf Amendment Act

New Delhi: The Supreme Court is slated to hear on Thursday a clutch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. As per the cause list...

Remarks on Col Sofiya Qureshi: MP High Court orders immediate filing of FIR against Minister Vijay Shah

Bhopal: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed law enforcement authorities to register a First Information Report (FIR) against Tribal Affairs Minister Vijay Shah following his controversial remarks concerning Army...

Justice B.R. Gavai sworn in as 52nd Chief Justice of India

Justice B.R. Gavai sworn in as 52nd Chief Justice of IndiaNew Delhi: President Droupadi Murmu on Wednesday administered the oath of office to Justice B.R. Gavai as the Chief Justice...

SC trashes plea to implement NEP in TN, Kerala and Bengal

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a plea seeking direction to the states of Tamil Nadu, Kerala and West Bengal to implement the National Education Policy...

‘Sharbat Jihad’ row: Delhi HC closes suit against Ramdev, Patanjali

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Friday closed a suit filed by pharmaceutical and food company Hamdard seeking the removal of Patanjali founder Baba Ramdev's controversial videos purportedly linking...

‘Highly irresponsible’: SC castigates Nishikant Dubey over remarks on judiciary

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has castigated BJP Lok Sabha member Nishikant Dubey over his "highly irresponsible" and "absurd" comments on the top court and the Chief Justice of India...

SC discloses asset details of judges on official website

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has decided to place assets of the apex court judges in the public domain by uploading these on its official website. “The Full Court of...

Read Previous

Kin of delhi riot victims struggle to get bodies

Read Next

Worst riots after Babri Masjid demolition stain Delhi; toll 27

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com