Justice Muralidhar, who pulled up Delhi Police over riots, transferred; timing questioned

Justice Muralidhar (Photo: Courtesy Law Live)

By Naz Asghar

Feb 27, 2020

New Delhi: The Ministry of Law and Justice on Wednesday transferred Justice S. Muralidhar of the Delhi High Court to the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which has raised many eyebrows, as the order comes a day on which the judge had pulled up the Delhi authorities over handling of riots in the capital and for not registering FIR in the case of inflammatory speeches made by some BJP leaders.

Recently, the Supreme Court Collegium had recommended the transfer of Justice Muralidhar to the Punjab and Haryana High Court, but the timing of the action on recommendation is being questioned.

Since the gazette notification does not mention the date from which the transfer order would be effective, it is supposed that it comes into force with immediate effect.

Earlier on Wednesday, a high court bench headed by Justice Muralidhar passed a series of orders castigating the Delhi authorities over handling of the violence in North-East Delhi and said that “another 1984-like situation cannot be allowed to happen in the city under its watch.”

”We cant let another 1984 scenario happen in this city, not under the watch of this court, observed Justice Murlidhar making an appeal to the authorities of Delhi Governmet and the Centre to reach out to the victims.

later on Wednesday, a bench comprising Justice Murlidhar and justice Talwant directed the Delhi police to take decision within a day regarding registration of FIR for inflammatory speeches against politicians Athakur, Pravesh Verma, Abhay Verma and Kapil Mishra, who had allegedly incited the violence.

The hearing was on an urgent petition filed by social activists Harsh Mander and Farah Naqvi.

The judge had also ordered safe passage for the collection of the bodies of the deceased, setting up of adequate number of helplines and setting up shelter for people displaced duriung the violence.

At least 32 people have so far lost their lives while over 200 have been injured after clashes between pro and anti-CAA protesters turned violent in North-East Delhi.

The recommendation for transfer of Justice Muralidhar was also opposed by the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) and it had February 20 announced a strike against the move.

In a resolution, the DHCBA had expressed its “shock, dismay and outrage” at the decision to recommend the transfer of “one of the finest judges to have adorned the bench.”

The resolution stated, “Such transfers are not only detrimental to our noble institution, but also tend to erode and dislodge the faith of the common litigant in the justice dispensation system. Such transfers also impede free and fair delivery of justice by the honourable bench.”

The Congress has also questioned the Government motive. Congress general secretary Priyanka Gandhi Vadra tweeted: “The midnight transfer of Justice Muralidhar isn’t shocking given the current dispensation, but it is certianly sad & shameful.”

“Millions of Indians have faith in a resilient & upright judiciary, the government’s attempts to muzzle justice & break their faith are deplorable,” she said.

Rahul Gandhi also joined in by tweeting:” Remembering the brave Judge Loya, who wasn’t transferred.”

Judge B.H. Loya was presiding over the Sohrabuddin Sheikh case, when he died in December 2014 at Nagpur under mysterious circumstances.

Earlier, Congress leader Randeep Surjewala said, “BjP feared that the conspiracy of the riots will get exposed and this is the reason why the Justice Murlidhar has been transferred,” adding that the transfer is an attempt to save the BJP leaders against whom Murlidhar had made strong observations.

However, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad has dismissed the criticism, saying that the transfer was done in pursuance of the order of the Supreme Court Collegium .

”Transfer of Hon’ble Justice Muralidhar was done pursuant to the recommendation dated 12.02.2020 of the Supreme Court collegium headed by Chief Justice of India. While transferring the judge consent of the judge is taken. The well settled process have been followed,” he tweeted.

”We respect independence of judiciary. Record of Congress in compromising independence of judiciary, superseding judges even of Supreme Court during Emergency is well known.They rejoice only when the judgment is of their liking otherwise raise questions on the institutions itself,’ the law Minister said.

Justice Muralidhar was also on the Delhi High Court Bench that first legalised homosexuality in 2009 in a case filed by Naz Foundation. He also led the division bench that convicted Uttar Pradesh PAC in the Hashimpura massacre case and Congress leader Sajjan Kumar in 1984 anti-sikh riots..

He has been on the full bench that in 2010 that ruled in favour of disclosing how many SC judges had declared their assets.

Justice Muralidhar had been appointed judge of Delhi High Court in 2006.

–India News Stream

HC asks Delhi govt, MCD to act against illegal encroachments on Yamuna Pusta Road

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has ordered the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and the city government to act against illegal encroachments prevailing along the Yamuna Pusta Road, which stretches...

Murshidabad violence: Calcutta HC orders formation of review committee

Kolkata: A special division bench of the Calcutta High Court, on Thursday, directed the formation of a committee to review the situation in minority-dominated Murshidabad district of West Bengal, which...

Waqf Act row: No fresh appointments or de-notification of existing waqfs, Centre assures SC

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday recorded the undertaking given by the Union government that no fresh members would be appointed to waqf boards and the Central Waqf Council...

Ukraine extends martial law, general mobilisation for 90 more days

Kyiv: The Ukrainian Parliament has voted to extend the country's current martial law and general military mobilisation for another 90 days, parliament member Yaroslav Zheleznyak said on social media Telegram....

‘Concerned over violence’: SC posts further hearing on Waqf (Amendment) Act challenge pleas for tomorrow

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed its concern over violence taking place amid protests against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. "One thing that is very disturbing is the...

Justice B.R. Gavai recommended as next Chief Justice of India

New Delhi: Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna has recommended the name of Justice B.R. Gavai as his successor. CJI Khanna will demit office on May 13, after a...

Murshidabad violence: Multiple petitions filed in Calcutta HC

Kolkata: Multiple petitions were filed in the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday in connection with the violence in West Bengal's Murshidabad district last week during protests against the Waqf Act....

Waqf Act will not be implemented in Bengal: Mamata Banerjee

  Kolkata:  West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Saturday said the Waqf (Amendment) Act will not be implemented in the state. "We have made our position clear on this...

Kerala HC junks charge sheet against Asianet News, Cong seeks CM Vijayan’s apology

Kochi: The Kerala High Court on Friday quashed a charge sheet against Asianet News and six journalists in a petition seeking a case to be registered under the POCSO Act...

NIA begins Tahawwur Rana’s questioning from today to unravel complete conspiracy behind 26/11

New Delhi: After successfully extraditing Tahawwur Hussain Rana from the US, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) will start questioning the 26/11 plotter on Friday. The anti-terror agency took custody of...

26/11 Mumbai terror attack mastermind Tahawwur Rana successfully extradited from the US, arrested: NIA

New Delhi: The National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Thursday said it had formally arrested Tahawwur Hussain Rana, the key conspirator in the deadly 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks immediately on his...

CJI Sanjeev Khanna-led Bench to hear on April 16 pleas against Waqf Amendment Act

New Delhi: The Supreme Court is slated to hear next week a clutch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. As per the cause list...

Read Previous

Kin of delhi riot victims struggle to get bodies

Read Next

Worst riots after Babri Masjid demolition stain Delhi; toll 27

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com