Law: No discrimination against LGBTs once Section 377 declared unconstitutional: SC

July 12, 2018

New Delhi: In a clear indication of its mind on the challenge to constitutional validity of Indian Penal Code’s Section 377 which criminalizes gay sex, the Supreme Court on Thursday said that all the discrimination against the LGBT community will be go once the provision is declared unconstitutional.

The court also made it clear that it would deciding on the validity of the provision on the basis of constitutional morality and not the majoritarian morality.

The five judge constitution bench, headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, said this in response to plea by senior counsel Chander Uday Singh that the court, besides declaring Section 377 unconstitutional, should also make positive declaration ending all kind of discriminations against the community.

Besides Chief Justice Misra, other judges on the bench are Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra.

Buttressing his plea seeking positive declaration, Singh said that merely declaring Section 377 void would not end the problem and cited the instance of Britain and the US where long after homosexuality was decriminalized, discrimination and prejudice against the community continued.

Appearing for intervener Dr. Alok Sarin – the head of psychiatric services at Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, he referred to the Mental Health Care Act, 2017 asserting that homosexuality is a natural variant of human sexuality and not a mental disorder.

At this, Justice Malhotra said: “Homosexuality has to be seen as variation and not an aberration” as ‘Prakriti’ and ‘Vikriti’ co-existed and there were hundreds of species which indulged in same sex intercourse.

Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta however differed with her, pointing out that the Prakriti and Vikriti could not be cited in the context of sexuality and homosexuality as the co-existence of two as mentioned in Vedas – Hindu philosophical texts – related to philosophical and spiritual spheres.

In a nearly nine hour long arguments spread over three days, the different petitioners and interveners represented by the senior counsel Ashok Desai, Krishnan Venugopal and others assailed the validity of Section 377 on the grounds of its being violative of fundamental rights guaranteeing equality before law, prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, freedom of speech and expression and protection of life and personal liberty.

Venugopal appearing for distinguished academicians belonging to Delhi University and JNU said that it was not a matter of just “consensual sexual acts” but that of freedom to live, express, and love.

He said that far too many people have been denied the benefit of being full citizen of this county for too long and top court being the guarantor of fundamental rights must step in and rectify it.

In a brief repose, Additional Solicitor General Mehta drew the attention of the court to some of the submission made by the petitioners and urged the court to limit the issue to the challenge to the constitutional validity of Section 377.

However, he took exception when counsel Manoj George, appearing for a church body, accused the Centre of taking a U-turn on the issue, saying it had left it to the wisdom of the court.

Justice Khanwilkar also observed that since then, the top court has decided that the right to privacy was a fundamental right – a right that was not there when it had in 2013 had set-aside the Delhi High Court judgment decriminalising Section 377.

As George told the court that three private members bills seeking to amend Section 377 were rejected, thereby indicating the intention of Parliament, a lawyer defended Section 377 saying that those challenging its validity were just 5 per cent of the country’s population while yet another lawyer urged the court that public opinion should be elicited before deciding the issue.

At this, Chief Justice Misra said: “It can’t be the shifting morality of the society but it has to be the constitutional morality” that would prevail in deciding the challenge.

“We don’t follow majoritarian morality but constitutional morality… We don’t decide constitutional issues by referendum.”

The court is hearing of a batch of petitions by hotelier Keshav Suri, Sangeet Natak Akademi awardee Bharatnatyam dancer Navtej Singh Johar, a group of past and present IITians and 12 bureaucrats who are LGBT, NGO Voices Against 377, and others assailing the constitutional validity of Section 377.

Giving 90 minutes to respondents to reply, the court on Thursday indicated that it would conclude hearing on Tuesday – July 17 – the next date of hearing.
(IANS)

Magisterial probe ordered into Mukhtar Ansari’s death

Lucknow: Uttar Pradesh government has ordered a magisterial investigation into the death of Mukhtar Ansari. The inquiry will be conducted by a three-member team, said a government spokesman. Mukhtar Ansari's...

Excise policy case: K. Kavitha sent to judicial custody till April 9

New Delhi: A court here on Tuesday sent Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLC, K. Kavitha to judicial custody till April 9 in connection with the Delhi excise policy case. The...

Delhi excise policy case: ED raids at premises of BRS leader Kavitha’s close relatives

Hyderabad: The ED officials on Saturday conducted searches at the premises of close relatives of Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader, K Kavitha in a money laundering case related to the...

China deports wanted gangster Prasad V Poojary; Mumbai Police brings him back

Mumbai: The Mumbai Police has brought back notorious gangster Prasad Vitthal Poojary - who was arrested in February 2023 following an Interpol notice - in what is a first-ever deportation...

Eminent doctor duped of Rs 2 cr by cyber thugs in Lucknow

Lucknow: An eminent doctor of the state capital has filed a complaint with the cyber cell after fraudsters duped him of over Rs 2 crore. The doctor said in his...

Punjab Health Secy gets notice on Moosewala’s father’s harassment claim

Chandigarh: The Punjab government has issued a show-cause notice to Ajoy Sharma, Principal Health Secretary, after Sidhu Moosewala's father alleged 'harassment' regarding the birth of his second child. The government...

Budaun murders: Second accused arrested from Bareilly

Badaun (UP): Uttar Pradesh Police arrested Javed, the second accused in the Budaun double murder case, from Bareilly on Thursday. Javed was on the run after the murder of two...

Father, uncle of Badaun accused taken into custody

Badaun (Uttar Pradesh): The father and the uncle of Javed, the second accused in the Badaun murder case, have been taken into custody even as Javed remains elusive. The police...

Badaun murders: Second accused still on the run

Badaun (UP):The second accused in the Badaun double murder case is still on the run and the police have set up teams to track him down. The second accused is...

Gurugram Police to apply for Elvish Yadav’s production warrant on March 20

Gurugram: Gurugram Police will apply for a production warrant for Bigg Boss OTT winner Elvish Yadav in connection with the assault case involving fellow YouTuber Sagar Thakur a.k.a Maxtern on...

Man held for murder of wife, daughter in UP district

Deoria (UP): The Deoria Police have arrested a 35-year-old man, Raju Kumar, for the murder of his wife and infant daughter. The arrest occurred on Sunday following a 45-day investigation...

Foreign students attacked in Gujarat University hostel over prayer gathering

Ahmedabad: A group of international students were attacked by a mob in the Gujarat University hostel, said officials on Sunday, adding that a probe has been launched. The attack, which...

Read Previous

SC slams ‘Superman’ Lt Gov for doing nothing on Delhi garbage issue

Read Next

Final autopsy confirms Delhi family members died of hanging

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com