Keep court proceedings on sensitive cases be excluded from live-streaming, suggests AG

Aug 17, 2018
New Delhi:The Attorney General has recommended that matters of national security, protection of confidential or sensitive information, or those which may provoke sentiments, arouse passions and provoke enmity among the communities should be excluded from the proposed live-streaming of the top court proceedings

Mentioning the eight categories of cases including matrimonial matters, cases of sexual assault and rape, cases involving juveniles requiring the protection and safety of the private life of young offenders, and those requiring witness protection, Attorney General K.K. Venugopal has in his recommendations said these should be kept out of the live-streaming.

He has also sought laying down the criteria to determine which category of cases would come within the ambit of matters of constitutional and national importance requiring their live-streaming.

The Attorney General’s “comprehensive recommendations” were handed over to the bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice D.Y. Chandrachud which the court asked him to consider further as senior counsel Indira Jaising suggested audio recording of the court proceedings and maintaining their archive, and the top court haing its own channel on the lines of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha TVs.

The Attorney General has said that the use of footage would be restricted for the purposes of news, current affairs and educational purposes only.

Seeking to prohibit the use of the feed for any commercial, promotional, light entertainment, satirical programmes or advertising, Attorney General Venugopal has recommended that the “live streaming or the webcast of the proceedings should not be reproduced, transmitted, uploaded, posted, modified, published or re-published to the public” without prior “written authorisation” of the top court.

Any unauthorised usage of the live streaming or webcasts would be “punishable as an offence under the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, the Information Technology Act, 2000 and any other provision of law in force”.

It has favoured application of contempt to such proceedings coupled with prohibitions, fines and penalties.

Recommending that the live streaming of the top court’s proceedings would start as a pilot project from Court No. 1 presided over by the Chief Justice of India, the Attorney General has said that the success of the pilot project would determine whether or not the live streaming should be introduced in all the courts of the Supreme Court and in courts pan India.

It says that the court must have the power to “limit, temporarily suspend, or disallow filming or broadcasting, if in its opinion, such measures are likely to interfere with the rights of the parties to the fair trial or otherwise interfere with the proper administration of justice.”

Suggesting the introduction of case management techniques to ensure that “matters are decided in speedy manner and lawyers abide by the time limits fixed prior to the hearing”, AG has recommended that the top court should lay the guidelines, on the lines of Court of Appeal in England, for having only two camera angles, one facing the judge and the other the lawyer.

The camera should not focus on the papers of lawyers.

The AG recommendations say that the live streaming of its proceedings in the cases of constitutional and national importance would make the concept of open court hearing more meaningful as it would be accessible to the people living down south in Kerala and in Northeast who otherwise are not able to travel to the national capital on every hearing date due to constraints of time and place.

He has said that this would help in decongesting the court room which are otherwise packed with litigants, lawyers, law students and interns.

The suggested recommendation by the AG is in pursuance to a plea of Jaising, who had moved the court seeking live streaming and video recording of court proceedings of cases of national importance with a bearing on a large section of people.

Jaising had based her PIL on the right to receive information under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and the principle of open courts and access to justice as protected under Article 21.

Pointing to the principle of law that justice should not only be done but also seen to be done, Jaising has contended that the best possible way to achieve this is to live-stream the proceedings in important cases so that arguments of all counsel and interaction between judges and lawyers during hearings is “recorded accurately and without distortions”.(IANS)

Shia leaders demand death for Hafiz Saeed, seek justice for 26/11 victims

Lucknow: The All India Shia Husaini Fund members have demanded justice for the 26/11 Mumbai attack victims by hanging its mastermind, Hafiz Saeed. Shia religious leaders and intellectuals from different...

Hundreds of jail police personnel go on mass CL in Gujarat

Ahmedabad: Hundreds of police personnel serving at various jails in Gujarat on Wednesday went on a mass casual leave demanding a pay hike at par with other police personnel and State...

Centre bans PFI, all its affiliates for 5 years. Here are key reasons

After two rounds of nationwide raids and arrests of over 240 members, the Centre on Wednesday banned the contentious Popular Front of India (PFI) and all its affiliates, excluding the...

Home Ministry all set to ban PFI after studying possible legal challenges

New Delhi: Days after the NIA and the ED raided several locations linked to the Popular Front of India (PFI) across the country, the Union Home Ministry is planning to...

ISI & Khalistani connections of Goldy Brar, Bishnoi

New Delhi, Sep 12 (IANS) The NIA sources have said that Goldy Brar and Lawrence Bishnoi gangs have contacts with Canada-based Khalistani elements and Pakistan-based ISI agents, and these gangs were...

IT sleuths seized our phones, cloned data, claim Oxfam, IPSMF

Days after the Income Tax Department carried out “surveys action” at their premises, Oxfam India and the Independent and Public-Spirited Media Foundation (IPSMF) alleged that the I-T personnel confiscated phones...

IS claims 1st Indian suicide bomber was Keralite Christian converted to Islam; agencies begin probe

Thiruvananthapuram: The Central intelligence agencies have commenced a probe after an article in the IS mouthpiece 'Voice of Koharasan' mentioned that 'the first Indian suicide bomber for them was a Keralite...

Hijab row not a controversy, but conspiracy against India: BJP

New Delhi: Referring to a plea in the Karnataka High Court to defer hearing on the 'hijab' row till the Assembly polls were over, the BJP has raised questions over the...

Congress to support BJP-backed Meghalaya govt

Shillong: In a significant political development, all five Congress MLAs in Meghalaya on Tuesday told Chief Minister Conrad Sangma that they wish to join the National People's Party (NPP)-led Meghalaya Democratic...

From reality to fiction, a tale of two opposites

New Delhi: Perhaps one becomes a different person after retirement? Released from the pressures and restrictions of a professional career you can give free rein to talents that remained dormant...

Ruins of ancient Sun temple in UP gets govt’s attention

Pratapgarh (Uttar Pradesh) Plans are afoot to revive a 8th century Sun temple, located in a Uttar Pradesh village in Pratapgarh district. A joint team of the state tourism department...

BHU scientist warns against ‘unscientific’ tree plantation

Varanasi: Even as Uttar Pradesh undertakes a massive tree plantation drive, a retired scientist and river engineer from the Banaras Hindu university (BHU) has warned against "unscientific plantation of trees...

Read Previous

Stranded pregnant woman in Kerala airlifted, gives birth

Read Next

Moderate carbohydrate intake may lower mortality risk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :