‘Highly irresponsible’: SC castigates Nishikant Dubey over remarks on judiciary

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has castigated BJP Lok Sabha member Nishikant Dubey over his “highly irresponsible” and “absurd” comments on the top court and the Chief Justice of India (CJI).

Amid ongoing hearings on the constitutionality of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, Nishikant Dubey, a Member of Parliament from Jharkhand’s Godda, during an interview, had said that “Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna is responsible for all the civil wars happening in India” and “to provoke the religious war in this country, only and only the Supreme Court is responsible”.

“In our opinion, the comments were highly irresponsible and reflect a penchant to attract attention by casting aspersions on the Supreme Court of India and the Judges of the Supreme Court,” said a bench of CJI Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, in its order, uploaded on the website of the apex court on Thursday.

Though the apex court refrained from entertaining a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking contempt of court action against Dubey, it said that courts need not protect their verdicts and decisions by taking recourse to the power of contempt.

However, the CJI Khanna-led Bench stressed that any attempt to spread communal hatred or indulge in hate speech must be dealt with an iron hand.

“Hate speech cannot be tolerated as it leads to loss of dignity and self-worth of the targeted group members, contributes to disharmony amongst groups, and erodes tolerance and open-mindedness, which is a must for a multi-cultural society committed to the idea of equality,” it said, adding that any attempt to cause alienation or humiliation of the targeted group is a criminal offence and must be dealt with accordingly.

In its order, the top court, after examining Dubey’s statement, said that the contents of his assertions tend to scandalise and lower the authority of the Supreme Court, if not interfere or tend to interfere with the judicial proceedings pending before the court, and have the tendency to interfere and obstruct the administration of justice.

Observing that there is no ‘civil war’ in India, the apex court said that judicial decisions are made in accordance with legal principles and not in keeping with political, religious or community considerations.

“Surely, courts and judges have shoulders broad enough and an implicit trust that the people would perceive and recognise when criticism or critique is biased, scandalous and ill-intentioned,” the CJI Khanna-led Bench added.

“We are of the firm opinion that courts are not as fragile as flowers to wither and wilt under such ludicrous statements. We do not believe that the confidence in and credibility of the courts in the eyes of the public can be shaken by such absurd statements, though it can be said without the shadow of doubt that there is a desire and deliberate attempt to do so,” said the top court.

The PIL filed by advocate Vishal Tiwari had said that the entire contents of Dubey’s interview were full of derogatory speech towards the judiciary and the Supreme Court. “Such acts amount to an offence punishable under BNS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) and also under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971,” it stated.

Refusing to entertain the plea seeking contempt action against Dubey, the CJI Khanna-led Bench, on Monday, had said: “We will pass a short order. We will not be entertaining it, but we will give a short order expressing our views.”

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had dissociated itself from Nishikant Dubey’s comments against the Supreme Court, clarifying that the statements were “personal opinions” and do not reflect the party’s stance.

In a post on X, BJP chief J.P. Nadda distanced the party from the comments by the MPs. “The BJP has nothing to do with the statements made by BJP MPs Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma on the judiciary and the Chief Justice of the country. These are their personal statements, but the BJP neither agrees with such statements nor does it ever support such statements. The BJP completely rejects these statements,” Nadda had said.

IANS

 

SC slams MP Minister Vijay Shah for remarks against Col Sofiya Qureshi

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday slammed Madhya Pradesh Tribal Affairs Minister Vijay Shah over his controversial remarks on Army officer Colonel Sofiya Qureshi. "What sort of statement are...

MP HC rebukes authorities on ‘poorly-drafted’ FIR against Minister Shah

Bhopal: The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Thursday sharply rebuked state authorities on the "poorly-drafted" FIR filed against Tribal Affairs Minister Vijay Shah and said that it will monitor the...

As Vijay Shah moves SC against MP HC order, Vivek Tankha questions BJP’s legal support

Bhopal: After BJP leader and Madhya Pradesh Minister Vijay Shah on Thursday approached the Supreme Court challenging a High Court order that initiated suo motu proceedings against him for his...

CJI Gavai-led Bench to hear tomorrow pleas against Waqf Amendment Act

New Delhi: The Supreme Court is slated to hear on Thursday a clutch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. As per the cause list...

Remarks on Col Sofiya Qureshi: MP High Court orders immediate filing of FIR against Minister Vijay Shah

Bhopal: The Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed law enforcement authorities to register a First Information Report (FIR) against Tribal Affairs Minister Vijay Shah following his controversial remarks concerning Army...

Justice B.R. Gavai sworn in as 52nd Chief Justice of India

Justice B.R. Gavai sworn in as 52nd Chief Justice of IndiaNew Delhi: President Droupadi Murmu on Wednesday administered the oath of office to Justice B.R. Gavai as the Chief Justice...

SC trashes plea to implement NEP in TN, Kerala and Bengal

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a plea seeking direction to the states of Tamil Nadu, Kerala and West Bengal to implement the National Education Policy...

‘Sharbat Jihad’ row: Delhi HC closes suit against Ramdev, Patanjali

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Friday closed a suit filed by pharmaceutical and food company Hamdard seeking the removal of Patanjali founder Baba Ramdev's controversial videos purportedly linking...

SC discloses asset details of judges on official website

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has decided to place assets of the apex court judges in the public domain by uploading these on its official website. “The Full Court of...

Cash at judge’s residence: SC ‘in-house’ panel submits probe report to CJI

New Delhi: The Supreme Court-appointed enquiry panel formed to probe into cash discovery allegations against Justice Yashwant Verma has submitted its report to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv...

Police will initiate suitable action against singer Sonu Nigam: K’taka Home Min

Bengaluru: Karnataka Home Minister G. Parameshwara stated on Monday that the state police would initiate appropriate action against popular singer Sonu Nigam for making a controversial statement linking the demand...

Justice Gavai-led Bench to now hear pleas against Waqf (Amendment) Act

New Delhi: A Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, on Monday directed that the clutch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Waqf...

Read Previous

India negates Pak drone/missile attack on over 15 places, knocks out Lahore air defence system

Read Next

False alarm: PIB refutes video claiming Pakistani strike on Indian military base

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com